Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Sexually Transmitted Infections 1998;74:323-330; doi:10.1136/sti.74.5.323
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Sexually Transmitted Infections, Vol 74, Issue 5 323-330, Copyright © 1998 by Sexually Transmitted Infections


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Patient referral outcome in gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections

YT van Duynhoven, WA Schop, WI van der Meijden and MJ van de Laar
Department for Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome of patient referral at the STD clinic of the University Hospital Rotterdam. To study characteristics of heterosexual index patients and partnerships related to referral outcome. METHODS: In 1994, patients with gonorrhoea and chlamydia were referred to public health nurses for interview and patient referral. Referral outcome was classified as "verified" if partners attended the STD clinic and as "believed" if partners were said to have attended elsewhere. RESULTS: Of 454 patients, 250 (55%) participated in the study. The outcome of patient referral for the 502 eligible partners was 103 (20.5%) verified referrals, 102 (20%) believed referrals, and 297 (59%) with unknown follow up. Of the 103 partners examined, 43 had an STD of which 63% reported no symptoms. The contact finding ratio was higher for chlamydia patients and heterosexual men. Also, referral was more effective for index patients with recent sexual contact, with follow up visits to the public health nurse, for men who were not commercial sex worker (CSW) clients, and, to a lesser degree, for Dutch patients and patients who sometimes used condoms. For steady partners, referral was improved if the last sexual contact was more recent. Casual partners visited the clinic more often if sexual contact occurred more than once, if the last contact was more recent, if they were older, and if they were Dutch. CONCLUSIONS: Patient referral was more effective for certain groups, such as chlamydia patients and steady partners, but was inadequate for others, including CSW and their clients, other "one night stands", young partners, and ethnic minorities.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Coleman, C., Lohan, M. (2009). Men Who Have Sex with Men and Partner Notification in Ireland: Beyond Binary Dualisms of Gender and Healthcare. Current Sociology 57: 211-230 [Abstract]  
  • Thurman, A. R., Holden, A. E C, Shain, R., Perdue, S., Piper, J. (2008). Partner notification of sexually transmitted infections among pregnant women. Int J STD AIDS 19: 309-315 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kretzschmar, M., Welte, R., van den Hoek, A., Postma, M. J. (2001). Comparative Model-based Analysis of Screening Programs for Chlamydia trachomatis Infections. Am J Epidemiol 153: 90-101 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Genitourinary jobs

Genitourinary jobs