ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of genital herpes in a genitourinary medicine clinic

A Scoular¹, G Gillespie² and W F Carman³

¹ Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, North Glasgow Hospitals University NHS Trust, Glasgow, UK
² West of Scotland Regional Virus Laboratory, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
³ West of Scotland Regional Virus Laboratory, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, and Division of Virology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Anne Scoular, Department of Genitourinary Medicine, The Sandyford Initiative, 2 Sandyford Place, Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow G3 7NB, UK;
anne{at}scoular.demon.co.uk

Background: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has well established advantages over culture for diagnosis of herpes viruses, but its technical complexity has limited its widespread application. However, recent methodological advances have rendered PCR more applicable to routine practice.

Aim: To compare automated PCR with viral culture for diagnosis of genital herpes.

Methods: We studied 236 patients presenting with clinical features suggestive of genital herpes at an inner city genitourinary medicine clinic. Two swabs were taken from each patient. Cell culture and typing were performed by standard methods. Automated PCR was performed using the LightCycler instrument and the infecting viral type was determined by restriction endonuclease digestion of amplicons.

Results: 109 patients (46%) had a positive test for herpes simplex virus (HSV). In 88, both PCR and culture were positive; in 21 PCR only was positive. With both detection methods, lesion duration and morphology were associated with HSV detection. Compared with culture alone, use of PCR increased sensitivity by 13.3% in specimens from vesicular lesions, by 27.4% from ulcerative lesions, and by 20.0% from crusting lesions.

Conclusions: We advocate adoption of automated PCR as an efficient HSV detection and typing method for diagnosis of genital herpes in routine clinical practice. PCR allowed rapid laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis and increased the overall HSV detection rate by 24%.

Keywords: herpes genitalis; herpes simplex virus; laboratory techniques

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Paz-Bailey, G, Ramaswamy, M, Hawkes, S J, Geretti, A M (2008). Herpes simplex virus type 2: epidemiology and management options in developing countries. Postgrad. Med. J. 84: 299-306 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sen, P, Barton, S E (2007). Genital herpes and its management. BMJ 334: 1048-1052 [Full Text]  
• Paz-Bailey, G, Ramaswamy, M, Hawkes, S J, Geretti, A M (2007). Herpes simplex virus type 2: epidemiology and management options in developing countries. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 16-22 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Geretti, A M (2006). Genital herpes. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: iv31-iv34 [Full Text]  
• Ramaswamy, M, McDonald, C, Smith, M, Thomas, D, Maxwell, S, Tenant-Flowers, M, Geretti, A M (2004). Diagnosis of genital herpes by real time PCR in routine clinical practice. Sex. Transm. Infect. 80: 406-410 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Scoular, A., Norrie, J., Gillespie, G., Mir, N., Carman, W F (2002). Longitudinal study of genital infection by herpes simplex virus type 1 in western Scotland over 15 years. BMJ 324: 1366-1367 [Full Text]  
• Scoular, A (2002). Using the evidence base on genital herpes: optimising the use of diagnostic tests and information provision. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78: 160-165 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2002). Scoring more hits with HSV. J. Clin. Pathol. 55: 285-285 [Full Text]