SYMPOSIUM

The geographical and temporal evolution of sexually transmitted disease epidemics

G P Garnett

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
G P Garnett, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College School of Medicine at St Mary's, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK;
g.garnett{at}ic.ac.uk

In developing appropriate interventions to control sexually transmitted infections (STIs) it is important to understand the distribution of infections, and how this distribution is influenced by the dynamic nature of epidemics. The epidemiology of STIs has been described as a series of phases, which loosely positions a population within the history of an epidemic. The relation between a mathematical theory describing STI epidemiology and the taxonomy of "phases" is explored in this review of the transmission dynamics of STIs. The likelihood of spread and persistence of infection depends upon the basic reproductive number, whereas the endemic prevalence of infection depends upon the way in which heterogeneity in risk focuses the density dependent constraints limiting the spread of infection. All interventions aimed at reducing the prevalence and incidence of infection must act through the reproductive number. The key parameters determining the reproductive number and the relevance of risk behaviours depend upon the biology of the particular infection. The division between high transmission probability, short duration infections and low transmission probability, long duration infections is explored.

Keywords: sexually transmitted diseases; epidemiology

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Walker, P T, Hallett, T B, White, P J, Garnett, G P (2008). Interpreting declines in HIV prevalence: impact of spatial aggregation and migration on expected declines in prevalence. Sex. Transm. Infect. 84: ii42-ii48 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chesson, H. W, White, P. J (2007). Influence of epidemic phase on the cost effectiveness of a prevention intervention for sexually transmitted infection: an exploratory analysis. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: i25-i29 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Aral, S. O, Fenton, K. A, Holmes, K. K (2007). Sexually transmitted diseases in the USA: temporal trends. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 257-266 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Garnett, G P, Gregson, S, Stanecki, K A (2006). Criteria for detecting and understanding changes in the risk of HIV infection at a national level in generalised epidemics.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: i48-i51 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Garnett, G P, Garcia-Calleja, J M, Rehle, T, Gregson, S (2006). Behavioural data as an adjunct to HIV surveillance data.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: i57-i62 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ward, H, Mercer, C H, Wellings, K, Fenton, K, Erens, B, Copas, A, Johnson, A M (2005). Who pays for sex? An analysis of the increasing prevalence of female commercial sex contacts among men in Britain. Sex. Transm. Infect. 81: 467-471 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Monteiro, E F, Lacey, C J N, Merrick, D (2005). The interrelation of demographic and geospatial risk factors between four common sexually transmitted diseases. Sex. Transm. Infect. 81: 41-46 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Aral, S O (2004). Sexual risk behaviour and infection: epidemiological considerations. Sex. Transm. Infect. 80: ii8-ii12 [Full Text]  
• Aral, S O (2002). Determinants of STD epidemics: implications for phase appropriate intervention strategies. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78: i3-13 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Turner, K M E, Garnett, G P (2002). The impact of the phase of an epidemic of sexually transmitted infection on the evolution of the organism. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78: i20-30 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Blanchard, J F (2002). Populations, pathogens, and epidemic phases: closing the gap between theory and practice in the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78: i183-188 [Abstract] [Full Text]