Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Sexually Transmitted Infections 2003;79:28-30; doi:10.1136/sti.79.1.28
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Sex Transm Inf 2003;79:28-30
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Repeat chlamydia screening by mail, San Francisco

P J Bloomfield1, K C Steiner2, C K Kent2 and J D Klausner2

1 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
2 San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Jeffrey D Klausner, MD, MPH, STD Prevention and Control Services, 1360 Mission Street, Suite 401, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA;
Jeff.Klausner{at}sfdph.org

Objectives: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of home screening for repeat chlamydial infection using urine test kits sent through the mail.

Methods: A letter offering home rescreening was mailed to 399 adults who previously tested positive for chlamydia. Kits were then mailed to anyone who did not actively decline. The home testing kits contained instructions on how to collect a urine specimen and return the specimen by mail. Specimens were tested with strand displacement amplification. A short survey asked individuals their level of concern about confidentiality, safety, and privacy of mail screening.

Results: Among the 313 potential test kit recipients, 22.4% responded. Response rates were highest among homosexual and bisexual men (38.6%), people 35 years or older (34.3%), and white people (34.6%). The overall positivity rate was 3.2% (2/63). In women 18–25 years old, the positivity was 13.3% (2/15).

Conclusions: Home testing with mailed urine collection kits is feasible and an acceptable method to screen for recurrent chlamydial infection. Young women would probably benefit most because of their higher rates of reinfection and risk for sequelae.

Keywords: chlamydia; screening; recurrent infection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Cook, R. L, Ostergaard, L., Hillier, S. L, Murray, P. J, Chang, C.-C. H, Comer, D. M, Ness, R. B, for the DAISY study team, (2007). Home screening for sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk young women: randomised controlled trial. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 286-291 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Eggleston, E, Turner, C F, Rogers, S M, Roman, A, Miller, W C, Villarroel, M A, Ganapathi, L (2005). Monitoring STI prevalence using telephone surveys and mailed urine specimens: a pilot test. Sex. Transm. Infect. 81: 236-238 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ward, H, Miller, R (2003). Taking up the reins. Sex. Transm. Infect. 79: 2-2 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Genitourinary jobs

Genitourinary jobs