ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Poor sensitivity and consistency of microscopy in the diagnosis of low grade non-gonococcal urethritis

R Smith¹, A J Copas², M Prince³, B George¹, A S Walker⁴ and S T Sadiq¹

¹ Mortimer Market Centre, Camden Primary Care Trust, London, UK
² Department of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, RFUCMS UCL, London, UK
³ University College Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
⁴ MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Tariq Sadiq
Department of GUM, St George’s Hospital Medical School, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0RE, UK; s.sadiq{at}sghms.ac.uk

Objectives: To determine the reliability of the diagnosis of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU), and the variation between and within microscopists, from urethral smears at a large London genitourinary medicine clinic.

Methods: A senior microscopist (SM) preselected 60 Gram stained urethral smear slides, 20 negative (<5 polymorphs/hpf), 20 low grade NGU (5–20 p/hpf), and 20 high grade NGU (>20 p/hpf). Ten experienced microscopists, blinded to these initial grades, examined all slides giving each a polymorph score. After relabelling and randomly changing their order, the slides were re-examined by the same microscopists. Finally, the SM determined whether the study had resulted in loss of cells from any of the slides. The SM’s initial grading and the consensus among microscopists provide two gold standards for analysis.

Results: Nine low grade and five high grade slides were removed from analysis because of loss of cells. By SM standard, considering microscopists’ readings as simply non-NGU (<5 p/hpf) or NGU (5 p/hpf), 97% from negative slides were correct (variation 93–100 across microscopists), 68% from low grade slides (45–95), and 94% from high grade slides (83–100). Consistency between repeat readings by the same microscopist was 96% for negatives, 75% for low grade and 89% for high grade slides. Results were similar by consensus standard.

Conclusions: There was considerable variation between and within microscopists in the diagnosis of NGU. Sensitivity was strongly related to grade of urethritis, with an appreciable proportion of low grade urethritis falsely diagnosed as negative. With increasing attendances for sexual health screening, a false positive rate of only 3% may lead to many false diagnoses.

Keywords: microscopy; non-gonococcal urethritis

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Shahmanesh, M, Moi, H, Lassau, F, Janier, M (2009). 2009 European Guideline on the Management of Male Non-gonococcal Urethritis. Int J STD AIDS 20: 458-464 [Full Text]  
• Yu, J T H T, Tang, W Y M, Lau, K H, Chong, L Y, Lo, K K (2008). Asymptomatic urethral infection in male sexually transmitted disease clinic attendees. Int J STD AIDS 19: 155-158 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Horner, P. (2007). Asymptomatic men: should they be tested for urethritis?. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 81-84 [Full Text]  
• Shahmanesh, M, Radcliffe, K W (2007). Is the urethral smear necessary in asymptomatic men attending a genitourinary medicine clinic?. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 79-81 [Full Text]  
• Wikstrom, A, Jensen, J S (2006). Mycoplasma genitalium: a common cause of persistent urethritis among men treated with doxycycline.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 276-279 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sadiq, S T, Taylor, S, Copas, A J, Bennett, J, Kaye, S, Drake, S M, Kirk, S, Pillay, D, Weller, I V D (2005). The effects of urethritis on seminal plasma HIV-1 RNA loads in homosexual men not receiving antiretroviral therapy. Sex. Transm. Infect. 81: 120-123 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Haddow, L J, Bunn, A, Copas, A J, Gilson, R, Prince, M, Ridgway, G L, Sadiq, S T (2004). Polymorph count for predicting non-gonococcal urethral infection: a model using Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosed by ligase chain reaction. Sex. Transm. Infect. 80: 198-200 [Abstract] [Full Text]