ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Diagnosis of genital chlamydia in primary care: an explanation of reasons for variation in chlamydia testing

C A M McNulty¹, E Freeman², J Bowen³, J Shefras⁴ and K A Fenton⁵

¹ Primary Care Unit, Microbiology Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK
² Gloucestershire Research and Development Support Unit, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK
³ Health Protection Agency, Primary Care Unit, Microbiology Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK
⁴ Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK
⁵ Health Protection Agency Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
C A M McNulty
Primary Care Unit, Microbiology Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK; jill.whiting{at}hpa.org.uk

Objectives: To explore the reasons for the 40-fold variation in diagnostic testing for genital Chlamydia trachomatis by general practices.

Methods: A qualitative study with focus groups. We randomly selected urban and rural high and low testing practices served by Bristol, Hereford, and Gloucester microbiology laboratories. Open questions were asked about the investigation of C trachomatis in men and women in different clinical contexts.

Results: The high and low testing practices did not differ in their age/sex make-up or by deprivation indices. There were major differences between high and low chlamydia testing practices. Low testing practices knew very little about the epidemiology and presentation of genital chlamydia infection and did not consider it in their differential diagnosis of genitourinary symptoms until patients had consulted several times. Low testers were less aware that chlamydia was usually asymptomatic, thought it was an inner city problem, and had poor knowledge of how to take diagnostic specimens. High testing practices either had a general practitioner with an interest in sexual health or a practice nurse who had completed specialist training in family planning. High testing practices were more cognizant of the symptoms and signs of chlamydia and always considered it in their differential diagnosis of genitourinary symptoms, including patients attending family planning clinics.

Conclusions: Any programme to increase chlamydia testing in primary care must be accompanied by an education and awareness programme especially targeted at low testing practices. This will need to include information about the benefits of testing and who, when, and how to test.

Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis; diagnosis; screening

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Brief Encounters

Helen Ward and Rob Miller
Sex Transm Inf 2004 80: 158. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• McNulty, C. A., Thomas, M., Bowen, J., Buckley, C., Charlett, A., Gelb, D., Foy, C., Sloss, J., Smellie, S. (2008). Interactive workshops increase chlamydia testing in primary care--a controlled study. Fam Pract 25: 279-286 [Abstract] [Full Text]