ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Developing national outcome standards for the management of gonorrhoea and genital chlamydia in genitourinary medicine clinics

N Low¹, J Welch² and K Radcliffe³

¹ Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK
² Department of Sexual Health, The Caldecot Centre, London SE5 9RS, UK
³ Whittall Street Clinic, Birmingham B4 6DH, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Nicola Low
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK; nicola.low{at}bristol.ac.uk

Background: Measuring clinical performance within a framework of clinical governance is increasingly important for monitoring improvements in patient care. Standards for quality indicators must, however, be achievable and evidence based. We describe an approach to the development of national standards for measuring outcomes of care for gonorrhoea and genital chlamydia in genitourinary medicine clinics.

Methods: Two standards for each infection, one reflecting quality of case management and one reflecting partner management were chosen by consensus. A systematic review of published and unpublished UK studies about gonorrhoea and chlamydia management was carried out and weighted averages calculated for each parameter, stratified by location. Genitourinary medicine practitioners around the country were also asked for their opinion about desirable values for each standard and the results compared. Variability in performance between centres was examined using Shewhart’s control charts.

Results: We identified 17 reports about gonorrhoea outcomes and 14 about chlamydia. There was marked heterogeneity in results according to geographical location and different standards were set for clinics in and out of London. Opinions from practitioners suggested much higher standards than the values obtained from the systematic review. There was evidence for special cause variation related to management of gonorrhoea and chlamydia in London clinics.

Conclusions: Standards set using expert opinion are unrealistic when compared to evidence of what is achievable. Evidence based methods should therefore be used to derive outcome standards for case management gonorrhoea and chlamydia. The control chart method identified clinics where investigation to find reasons for special cause variation in performance should be undertaken to change practice.

Keywords: chlamydia; clinical effectiveness; gonorrhoea; medical audit; quality indicators

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Brief Encounters

Helen Ward and Rob Miller
Sex Transm Inf 2004 80: 158. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Manavi, K, Bhaduri, S, Tariq, A, on behalf of the West Midlands BASHH Audit Group, (2008). Audit on the success of partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in the West Midlands. Int J STD AIDS 19: 856-858 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shivasankar, S., Challenor, R., Ekanayaka, R. (2008). Patient-delivered partner therapy in the UK: what do patients think?. Int J STD AIDS 19: 433-436 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shivasankar, S., Challenor, R. (2008). Patient-delivered partner therapy in the UK: what do the professionals think?. Int J STD AIDS 19: 437-440 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McClean, H., Carne, C., Bunting, P., Bhaduri, S., Fernandes, A., Dhar, J., Estreich, S., Daniels, D., on behalf of the National Audit Group of the Briti, (2008). UK National Audit of Chlamydial Infection Management in Sexual Health Clinics. Case notes audit: information-giving, partner notification and follow-up. Int J STD AIDS 19: 473-476 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Steedman, N, Oroz, C, Fernando, I, Baguley, S (2008). An audit of the interval to treatment of anogenital Chlamydia trachomatis at Scottish genitourinary medicine clinics. Int J STD AIDS 19: 121-122 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Trelle, S., Shang, A., Nartey, L., Cassell, J. A, Low, N. (2007). Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review. BMJ 334: 354-354 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Low, N., McCarthy, A., Roberts, T. E, Huengsberg, M., Sanford, E., Sterne, J. A C, Macleod, J., Salisbury, C., Pye, K., Holloway, A., Morcom, A., Patel, R., Robinson, S. M, Horner, P., Barton, P. M, Egger, M. (2006). Partner notification of chlamydia infection in primary care: randomised controlled trial and analysis of resource use. BMJ 332: 14-19 [Abstract] [Full Text]