Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Sexually Transmitted Infections 2004;80:335-341; doi:10.1136/sti.2004.012856
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Sex Transm Infect 2004;80:335-341
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

REVIEW

Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening

D S LaMontagne1, K A Fenton1, S Randall2, S Anderson3 and P Carter3 on behalf of the National Chlamydia Screening Steering Group

1 HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections Department, Health Protection Agency, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK
2 Department of Health, Sexual Health and Substance Misuse Team, Room 580D, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London, and Ella Gordon Unit, St Mary’s Hospital, Portsmouth PO3 6AD, UK
3 Department of Health, Sexual Health and Substance Misuse Team, Room 580D, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London SE1 6LH, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
D Scott LaMontagne
MPH, FRIPH, CS, Health Protection Agency, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK; scott.lamontagne{at}hpa.org.uk

ABSTRACT

Background: The phased implementation of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) began in September 2002. The NCSP offers opportunistic screening for chlamydia to women and men under 25 years of age attending clinical and non-clinical screening venues using non-invasive urine or vulvo-vaginal swab samples tested via nucleic acid amplification. This review describes the implementation of the NCSP, reports positivity rates for the first year, and explores risk factors for genital chlamydial infection.

Methods: Cross sectional study of the first year’s screening data from the NCSP. A standardised core dataset for each screening test was collected from 302 screening venues, excluding genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics, across 10 phase 1 programme areas. We estimated chlamydia positivity by demographic and behavioural characteristics, and investigated factors associated with infection through univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Chlamydia positivity among people under 25 years of age screened in non-GUM settings was 10.1% (1538/15 241) in women and 13.3% (156/1172) in men. Risk factors varied by sex: for women—age 16–19, non-white ethnicity, and sexual behaviours were associated with infection; for men—only age 20–24 and non-white ethnicity were associated with infection.

Discussion: In the first phase of the NCSP, 16 413 opportunistic screens among young adults under 25 years of age were performed at non-GUM settings and testing volume increased over time. Rates of disease were similar to those found during the English screening pilot and were comparable to the first year of widespread screening in Sweden and the United States. The screening programme in England will continue to expand as further phases are included, with national coverage anticipated by 2008.

Abbreviations: CDSC, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre; GUM, genitourinary medicine; LCR, ligase chain reaction; NAATs, nucleic acid amplification tests; NCSP, National Chlamydia Screening Programme; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PCTs, primary care trusts; PIAG, patient information advisory group; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease; SDA, strand displacement amplification; TMA, transcription mediated amplification

Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis; screening; England; genital chlamydial infection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Brief Encounters
Helen Ward and Rob Miller
Sex Transm Inf 2004 80: 329. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hirst, H, Dinsmore, W W (2009). Chlamydia Screening Programme, HMP Hydebank Wood Young Offender Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK. Int J STD AIDS 20: 360-361 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chen, M Y, Fairley, C K, De Guingand, D, Hocking, J, Tabrizi, S, Wallace, E M, Grover, S, Gurrin, L, Carter, R, Pirotta, M, Garland, S (2009). Screening pregnant women for chlamydia: what are the predictors of infection?. Sex. Transm. Infect. 85: 31-35 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chaudhary, R., Heffernan, C. M., Illsley, A. L., Jarvie, L. K., Lattimer, C., Nwuba, A. E., Platford, E. W. (2008). Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia: a pilot study into male perspectives on provision of Chlamydia screening in a UK university. J Public Health (Oxf) 30: 466-471 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Blume, A, Main, C, Patel, R, Foley, E (2008). Should men with asymptomatic non-specific urethritis be identified and treated?. Int J STD AIDS 19: 744-746 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Doshi, J S, Power, J, Allen, E (2008). Acceptability of chlamydia screening using self-taken vaginal swabs. Int J STD AIDS 19: 507-509 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cunningham, K. A., Beagley, K. W. (2008). Male Genital Tract Chlamydial Infection: Implications for Pathology and Infertility. Biol. Reprod. 79: 180-189 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Scott LaMontagne, D, Baster, K., Emmett, L., Nichols, T., Randall, S., McLean, L., Meredith, P., Harindra, V., Tobin, J. M, Underhill, G. S, Graham Hewitt, W, Hopwood, J., Gleave, T., Ghosh, A. K, Mallinson, H., Davies, A. R, Hughes, G., Fenton, K. A (2007). Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16 24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: a prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 292-303 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Robinson, S., Roberts, T., Barton, P., Bryan, S., Macleod, J., McCarthy, A., Egger, M., Sanford, E., Low, N., for the Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) Projec, (2007). Healthcare and patient costs of a proactive chlamydia screening programme: the Chlamydia Screening Studies project. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 276-281 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sripada, S, Logan, S, McGillivray, S, Mckenzie, H, Templeton, A, Hamilton, M, Sutherland, A, Bhattacharya, S (2007). Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in men attending three different secondary healthcare settings. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 282-285 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hughes, G., Williams, T., Simms, I., Mercer, C., Fenton, K., Cassell, J. (2007). Use of a primary care database to determine trends in genital chlamydia testing, diagnostic episodes and management in UK general practice, 1990 2004. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 310-313 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Adams, E. J, Turner, K. M E, Edmunds, W J., Roberts, T E, Low, N, Adams, E. J, Edmunds, W J., Turner, K. M E (2007). The cost effectiveness of opportunistic chlamydia screening in England. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 267-275 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Magbanua, J. P. V, Goh, B. T., Michel, C.-E., Aguirre-Andreasen, A., Alexander, S., Ushiro-Lumb, I., Ison, C., Lee, H. (2007). Chlamydia trachomatis variant not detected by plasmid based nucleic acid amplification tests: molecular characterisation and failure of single dose azithromycin. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 339-343 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jones, R., Boag, F. (2007). Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. BMJ 334: 703-704 [Full Text]  
  • Sanders, L. S, Nsuami, M., Cropley, L. D, Taylor, S. N (2007). Reasons given by high school students for refusing sexually transmitted disease screening. Health Education Journal 66: 44-57 [Abstract]  
  • Sripada, S., Fonseca, S., Lee, A., Harrild, K., Giannaris, D., Mathers, E., Bhattacharya, S. (2007). Trends in Semen Parameters in the Northeast of Scotland. J Androl 28: 313-319 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Turner, K M E, Adams, E J, LaMontagne, D S, Emmett, L, Baster, K, Edmunds, W J (2006). Modelling the effectiveness of chlamydia screening in England. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 496-502 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mills, N., Daker-White, G., Graham, A., Campbell, R., For The Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) Group, (2006). Population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of those screened. Fam Pract 23: 550-557 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Adams, E J, Turner, K M E (2006). COMMENTARY.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 201-201 [Full Text]  
  • Low, N (2006). Evaluating novel interventions for chlamydia screening.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 97-98 [Full Text]  
  • Novak, D P, Karlsson, R B (2006). Simplifying chlamydia testing: an innovative Chlamydia trachomatis testing approach using the internet and a home sampling strategy: population based study.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 142-147 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brown, A E, Tomkins, S E, Logan, L E, LaMontagne, D S, Munro, H L, Hope, V D, Righarts, A, Blackham, J E, Rice, B D, Chadborn, T R, Tookey, P A, Parry, J V, Delpech, V, Gill, O N, Fenton, K A (2006). Monitoring the effectiveness of HIV and STI prevention initiatives in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: where are we now?. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 4-10 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Low, N., McCarthy, A., Roberts, T. E, Huengsberg, M., Sanford, E., Sterne, J. A C, Macleod, J., Salisbury, C., Pye, K., Holloway, A., Morcom, A., Patel, R., Robinson, S. M, Horner, P., Barton, P. M, Egger, M. (2006). Partner notification of chlamydia infection in primary care: randomised controlled trial and analysis of resource use. BMJ 332: 14-19 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fenton, K A, Ward, H (2004). National chlamydia screening programme in England: making progress. Sex. Transm. Infect. 80: 331-333 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Genitourinary jobs

Genitourinary jobs