ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Dark ground microscopy and treponemal serological tests in the diagnosis of early syphilis

H L Wheeler, S Agarwal and B T Goh

The Ambrose King Centre, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr H L Wheeler
The Ambrose King Centre, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB, UK; hwheeler55{at}hotmail.com

Objectives: To evaluate the use of dark ground microscopy (DGM) and treponemal serological tests in the diagnosis of primary (PS) and secondary (SS) syphilis.

Methods: A retrospective case note review of patients with early syphilis who attended our department between January 2001 and December 2002. Data were collected on demographics, results of treponemal serology and DGM.

Results: 50 individuals had PS and 36 individuals had SS. DGM was performed in 31/50 (62%) of PS cases and this was positive in 97%. In 17 (34%) cases of PS, treponemal EIA was negative initially. DGM was performed on 13 of these, all of which were positive. Therefore, EIA had a sensitivity of 57% when compared to DGM. In 27 patients where EIA-IgM was performed, this was positive in 22 (81%), of which 12 were EIA negative on initial screening. All SS cases had positive EIA. DGM was performed in 19/36 (52%) of SS cases and was positive in 16/19—that is, a sensitivity of 84% when compared to EIA. The major reason why DGM was not performed in the cases of PS was that herpes was the presumed diagnosis and in SS the rash was attributed to other causes.

Conclusions: DGM is a rapid and sensitive test while EIA takes time for results and is less sensitive in PS. EIA-IgM is a useful adjunct in PS. DGM allows immediate diagnosis, treatment, and partner notification preventing further transmission. Genitourinary medicine clinics should have trained staff to perform DGM on all anogenital ulcers and suspected syphilitic lesions.

Abbreviations: DFA-Tp, direct fluorescent antibody; DGM, dark ground microscopy; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PS, primary syphilis; RPR, rapid plasma reagin; SS, secondary syphilis

Keywords: dark ground microscopy; treponemal serological tests; syphilis

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• French, P, Gomberg, M, Janier, M, Schmidt, B, van Voorst Vader, P, Young, H (2009). IUSTI: 2008 European Guidelines on the Management of Syphilis. Int J STD AIDS 20: 300-309 [Full Text]  
• Young, H, Pryde, J, Duncan, L, Dave, J (2009). The Architect Syphilis assay for antibodies to Treponema pallidum: an automated screening assay with high sensitivity in primary syphilis. Sex. Transm. Infect. 85: 19-23 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kingston, M, French, P, Goh, B, Goold, P, Higgins, S, Sukthankar, A, Stott, C, Turner, A, Tyler, C, Young, H (2008). UK National Guidelines on the Management of Syphilis 2008. Int J STD AIDS 19: 729-740 [Full Text]  
• McMillan, A, Young, H (2008). Qualitative and quantitative aspects of the serological diagnosis of early syphilis. Int J STD AIDS 19: 620-624 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Eccleston, K., Collins, L., Higgins, S. P (2008). Primary syphilis. Int J STD AIDS 19: 145-151 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• French, P. (2007). Syphilis. BMJ 334: 143-147 [Full Text]  
• Goh, B T (2005). Syphilis in adults. Sex. Transm. Infect. 81: 448-452 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2004). Dark ground microscopy and treponemal serology for diagnosis of early syphilis. J. Clin. Pathol. 57: 1263-1263 [Full Text]