CHLAMYDIA

¹ STI AIDS the Netherlands (SOA AIDS Nederland), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
² Municipal Public Health Service Rotterdam, the Netherlands
³ Municipal Public Health Service Eastern South Limburg, the Netherlands
⁴ Municipal Public Health Service Groningen, the Netherlands
⁵ Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J van Bergen
STI AIDS, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; jvanbergen{at}soaaids.nl

Objectives: Chlamydia trachomatis (Chlamydia) is the most prevalent sexually transmitted bacterial infection and can cause considerable reproductive morbidity in women. Chlamydia screening programmes have been considered but policy recommendations are hampered by the lack of population based data. This paper describes the prevalence of Chlamydia in 15–29 year old women and men in rural and urban areas, as determined through systematic population based screening organised by the Municipal Public Health Services (MHS), and discusses the implications of this screening strategy for routine implementation.

Methods: Stratified national probability survey according to "area address density" (AAD). 21 000 randomly selected women and men in four regions, aged 15–29 years received a home sampling kit. Urine samples were returned by mail and tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Treatment was via the general practitioner, STI clinic, or MHS clinic.

Results: 41% (8383) responded by sending in urine and questionnaire. 11% (2227) returned a refusal card. Non-responders included both higher and lower risk categories. Chlamydia prevalence was significantly lower in rural areas (0.6%, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.1) compared with very highly urbanised areas (3.2%, 95% CI 2.4 to 4.0). Overall prevalence was 2.0% (95% CI 1.7 to 2.3): 2.5% (95% CI 2.0 to 3.0%) in women and 1.5% (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8) in men. Of all cases 91% were treated. Infection was associated with degree of urbanisation, ethnicity, number of sex partners, and symptoms.

Conclusion: This large, population based study found very low prevalence in rural populations, suggesting that nationwide systematic screening is not indicated in the Netherlands and that targeted approaches are a better option. Further analysis of risk profiles will contribute to determine how selective screening can be done.

Abbreviations: AAD, area address density; MHS, Municipal Public Health Services; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease; PPV, positive predictive value

Keywords: chlamydia; chlamydia trachomatis; screening; prevalence; population based; the Netherlands

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Brief Encounters

Nicola Low, Rob Miller, and Helen Ward
Sex Transm Inf 2005 81: 2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Mevissen, F. E.F., Meertens, R. M., Ruiter, R. A.C., Feenstra, H., Schaalma, H. P. (2009). HIV/STI Risk Communication: The Effects of Scenario-based Risk Information and Frequency-based Risk Information on Perceived Susceptibility to Chlamydia and HIV. J Health Psychol 14: 78-87 [Abstract]  
• Miller, R. F, Ward, H. (2007). Journal impact factors for 2006. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 346-346 [Full Text]  
• Cook, R. L, Ostergaard, L., Hillier, S. L, Murray, P. J, Chang, C.-C. H, Comer, D. M, Ness, R. B, for the DAISY study team, (2007). Home screening for sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk young women: randomised controlled trial. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 286-291 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• van der Snoek, E. M, Ossewaarde, J. M, van der Meijden, W. I, Mulder, P. G H, Thio, H B. (2007). The use of serological titres of IgA and IgG in (early) discrimination between rectal infection with non-lymphogranuloma venereum and lymphogranuloma venereum serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 330-334 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Turner, K M E, Adams, E J, LaMontagne, D S, Emmett, L, Baster, K, Edmunds, W J (2006). Modelling the effectiveness of chlamydia screening in England. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 496-502 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Skidmore, S., Horner, P., Herring, A., Sell, J., Paul, I., Thomas, J., Caul, E. O., Egger, M., McCarthy, A., Sanford, E., Salisbury, C., Macleod, J., Sterne, J. A. C., Low, N., for the Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) Projec, (2006). Vulvovaginal-Swab or First-Catch Urine Specimen To Detect Chlamydia trachomatis in Women in a Community Setting?. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 4389-4394 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Waalboer, R, van der Snoek, E M, van der Meijden, W I, Mulder, P G H, Ossewaarde, J M (2006). Analysis of rectal Chlamydia trachomatis serovar distribution including L2 (lymphogranuloma venereum) at the Erasmus MC STI clinic, Rotterdam.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 207-211 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Low, N (2006). Evaluating novel interventions for chlamydia screening.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 97-98 [Full Text]  
• Novak, D P, Karlsson, R B (2006). Simplifying chlamydia testing: an innovative Chlamydia trachomatis testing approach using the internet and a home sampling strategy: population based study.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 142-147 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gotz, H M, Veldhuijzen, I K, Ossewaarde, J M, de Zwart, O, Richardus, J H (2006). Chlamydia trachomatis infections in multi-ethnic urban youth: a pilot combining STI health education and outreach testing in Rotterdam, Netherlands.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 148-152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gotz, H M, van Bergen, J E A M, Veldhuijzen, I K, Broer, J, Hoebe, C J P A, Richardus, J H (2005). A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex. Transm. Infect. 81: 24-30 [Abstract] [Full Text]