Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Sexually Transmitted Infections 2005;81:24-30; doi:10.1136/sti.2004.010181
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Sex Transm Infect 2005;81:24-30
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

CHLAMYDIA

A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection

H M Götz1, J E A M van Bergen2, I K Veldhuijzen1, J Broer3, C J P A Hoebe4 and J H Richardus1,5

1 Municipal Public Health Service Rotterdam, the Netherlands
2 STI AIDS (SOA AIDS Nederland) Amsterdam, the Netherlands
3 Municipal Public Health Service Groningen, the Netherlands
4 Municipal Public Health Service Eastern South Limburg, the Netherlands
5 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
6 Municipal Public Health Service ‘Hart voor Brabant’, the Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Ms H M Götz
Municipal Health Service Rotterdam, Department Infectious Diseases, PO Box 70032, 3000 LP Rotterdam, the Netherlands; gotzh{at}ggd.rotterdam.nl

Background: Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections is aimed at the reduction of these infections and subsequent complications. Selective screening may increase the cost effectiveness of a screening programme. Few population based systematic screening programmes have been carried out and attempts to validate selective screening criteria have shown poor performance. This study describes the development of a prediction rule for estimating the risk of chlamydial infection as a basis for selective screening.

Methods: A population based chlamydia screening study was performed in the Netherlands by inviting 21 000 15–29 year old women and men in urban and rural areas for home based urine testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for chlamydial infection among 6303 sexually active participants, and the discriminative ability was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Internal validity was assessed with bootstrap resampling techniques.

Results: The prevalence of C trachomatis (CT) infection was 2.6% (95% CI 2.2 to 3.2) in women and 2.0% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.7) in men. Chlamydial infection was associated with high level of urbanisation, young age, Surinam/Antillian ethnicity, low/intermediate education, multiple lifetime partners, a new contact in the previous two months, no condom use at last sexual contact, and complaints of (post)coital bleeding in women and frequent urination in men. A prediction model with these risk factors showed adequate discriminative ability at internal validation (AUC 0.78).

Conclusion: The prediction rule has the potential to guide individuals in their choice of participation when offered chlamydia screening and is a promising tool for selective CT screening at population level.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; AAD, area address density; MHS, Municipal Public Health Service; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease

Keywords: chlamydia trachomatis; mass screening; risk factors; Netherlands; prediction rule


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands
J van Bergen, H M Götz, J H Richardus, C J P A Hoebe, J Broer, A J T Coenen for the PILOT CT study group
Sex Transm Inf 2005 81: 17-23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Brief Encounters
Nicola Low, Rob Miller, and Helen Ward
Sex Transm Inf 2005 81: 2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Carre, H, Boman, J, Osterlund, A, Garden, B, Nylander, E (2008). Improved contact tracing for Chlamydia trachomatis with experienced tracers, tracing for one year back in time and interviewing by phone in remote areas. Sex. Transm. Infect. 84: 239-242 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Miller, R. F, Ward, H. (2007). Journal impact factors for 2006. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 346-346 [Full Text]  
  • Low, N (2006). Evaluating novel interventions for chlamydia screening.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 97-98 [Full Text]  
  • Gotz, H M, Veldhuijzen, I K, Ossewaarde, J M, de Zwart, O, Richardus, J H (2006). Chlamydia trachomatis infections in multi-ethnic urban youth: a pilot combining STI health education and outreach testing in Rotterdam, Netherlands.. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: 148-152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van Bergen, J, Gotz, H M, Richardus, J H, Hoebe, C J P A, Broer, J, Coenen, A J T, for the PILOT CT study group, (2005). Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands. Sex. Transm. Infect. 81: 17-23 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Genitourinary jobs

Genitourinary jobs