Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Sexually Transmitted Infections 2006;82:321-322; doi:10.1136/sti.2005.018069
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

IN PRACTICE

Are patient responses to sensitive sexual health questions influenced by the sex of the practitioner?

S Ginige1, M Y Chen2 and C K Fairley3

1 Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, and Ministry of Health Sri Lanka
2 Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
3 Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, The Alfred Hospital, and School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Christopher Fairley
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, 580 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia; cfairley{at}unimelb.edu.au

Objective: To determine whether a patient’s responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour are influenced by the sex of their treating practitioner.

Methods: An audit was conducted on the computerised medical records of all patients attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre through the walk-in triage system between January 2003 and July 2005. Patient responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour were analysed according to patient group (based upon the sex of their sexual partners) and the sex of the treating practitioner.

Results: There was no significant difference in the reported number of sexual partners, condom use, sex overseas, injecting drug use, or commercial sex work based on the sex of the treating practitioner for the different patient groups. This held true whether clients were homosexual men (n = 1609, p>0.07), heterosexual men (n = 4847, p>0.11), or women (n = 4910, p>0.08).

Conclusions: The sex of the practitioner did not significantly influence patient responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour.

Keywords: healthcare providers; interpersonal relationships; sexual behaviour


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Doxanakis, A, Hayes, R D, Chen, M Y, Gurrin, L C, Hocking, J, Bradshaw, C S, Williams, H, Fairley, C K (2008). Missing pelvic inflammatory disease? Substantial differences in the rate at which doctors diagnose PID. Sex. Transm. Infect. 84: 518-523 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Genitourinary jobs

Genitourinary jobs