Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 29 November 2006. doi:10.1136/sti.2006.022772
Sexually Transmitted Infections 2007;83:419-420
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

IN PRACTICE

Randomised controlled trial on whether advance knowledge of prostate-specific antigen testing improves participant reporting of unprotected sex

Sarah C Thomsen1, Maria F Gallo1, Wilkister Ombidi2, Zablon Omungo3, Barbara Janowitz1, Mark Hawken2, Heidi Tucker1, Emelita L Wong1 and Marcia M Hobbs4

1 Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
2 International Centre for Reproductive Health, Mombasa, Kenya
3 Family Health International, Nairobi, Kenya
4 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M F Gallo
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Reproductive Health, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, MS K-34, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA; mgallo{at}cdc.gov

Objectives: To determine whether the process of informing research participants that they would be tested for the presence of a biological marker of semen exposure would reduce bias in their reports of unprotected sex.

Methods: A randomised trial of 210 female sex workers from Mombasa, Kenya, was conducted, where half the group had advance knowledge (via the request for informed consent) that they would be tested for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in their vaginal fluid before they reported on sex and condom use for the past 48 h. The other half were invited to participate (via additional informed consent) in the test for PSA after they had already consented to be questioned and reported on these sexual behaviours. A trained nurse instructed participants to self-swab to collect vaginal fluid specimens, which were tested for PSA using ELISA.

Results: Reporting of unprotected sex did not differ between those with advance knowledge of the test for PSA and those without this knowledge (14.3% v 11.4%, respectively; p = 0.27). Surprisingly, more women with advance knowledge (15.8%) had discrepant self reports and PSA results than women without advance knowledge (9.1%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.8 to 4.5).

Conclusions: Knowing that one’s answers to a questionnaire could be verified with a biological marker of semen exposure did not make respondents more likely to report unprotected sex.

Abbreviations: PSA, prostate-specific antigen


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Genitourinary jobs

Genitourinary jobs