Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 27 March 2007. doi:10.1136/sti.2006.023598
Sexually Transmitted Infections 2007;83:i43-i49
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

REPORT

Prevention strategies for sexually transmitted infections: importance of sexual network structure and epidemic phase

Helen Ward

Edited by: Sevgi O Aral and James Blanchard

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Helen Ward
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK; h.ward{at}imperial.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

This article explores the relationship between sexual network structure and epidemic phase in sexually transmitted disease epidemiology, and discusses how this may be used to inform prevention strategies at the population level. There are relatively few empirical studies of sexual networks, and even fewer that track the evolution of networks over time. Most studies focus on networks in the context of disease transmission and will miss the network structure in the wider population. Results from disease-related studies in the early epidemic phase show densely connected networks with multiple short loops. In later hyperendemic phases, networks appear more loosely connected with a dominance of long branching structures. The latter structure has also been described from non-diseased populations. These structures evolve over time, both of the epidemic curve and as a cohort ages and undergoes demographic change. Population strategies for prevention should vary depending on network structure and epidemic phase. In early and late epidemic phases, interventions focusing on high-risk populations—that is, dense areas of a sexual network—will have a large population effect. In contrast, for established endemic diseases a smaller change (of behaviour or interruption of transmission through screening) in a larger proportion of the population could have the largest population impact. Further empirical work on the way network structures relate to epidemic phase, and how this changes with age and social development will help to inform intervention strategies at the population level.

Abbreviations: STI, sexually transmitted infection

Keywords: sexually transmitted disease; epidemiology; prevention; sexual network; epidemic phase


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Schleihauf, E, Watkins, R E, Plant, A J (2009). Heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of bacterial sexually transmitted infections. Sex. Transm. Infect. 85: 45-49 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Knapper, C M, Roderick, J, Smith, J, Temple, M, Birley, H D L (2008). Investigation of an HIV transmission cluster centred in South Wales. Sex. Transm. Infect. 84: 377-380 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Genitourinary jobs

Genitourinary jobs