Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Sexually Transmitted Infections 2008;84:483-487; doi:10.1136/sti.2008.030478
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Preference for gel over suppository as delivery vehicle for a rectal microbicide: results of a randomised, crossover acceptability trial among men who have sex with men

A Carballo-Diéguez1, C Dolezal1, J A Bauermeister1, W O’Brien2, A Ventuneac1 and K Mayer2,3

1 HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
2 Fenway Institute, Fenway Community Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
3 Miriam Hospital/Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr A Carballo-Diéguez, Unit 15, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA; ac72{at}columbia.edu

Objective: To assess whether men who have sex with men (MSM) prefer a gel or a suppository as a delivery vehicle for a rectal microbicide.

Methods: 77 HIV-negative MSM with a recent history of inconsistent condom use during receptive anal intercourse (RAI) who acknowledged being at risk of contracting HIV were enrolled in a randomised, crossover acceptability trial. They compared 35 ml placebo gel with 8 g placebo rectal suppositories used on up to three RAI occasions each.

Results: Participants preferred the gel over the suppository (75% versus 25%, p<0.001) and so did their partners (71% versus 29%, p<0.001). The gel received more favourable ratings overall and on attributes such as colour, smell, consistency, feeling in rectum immediately after insertion and/or 30 minutes after insertion and application process. The gel resulted in less negative ratings in terms of participants being bothered by leakage, soiling, bloating, gassiness, stomach cramps, urge to have bowel movement, diarrhoea, pain or trauma. Participants liked the gel more in terms of feelings during anal sex, sexual satisfaction, partners’ sexual satisfaction and liking the product when condoms were used and when condoms were not used.

Conclusions: In this sample taken from one of the populations most likely to benefit from rectal microbicide availability, gel had greater acceptability than a suppository as a potential microbicide vehicle.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stall, R., Hart, G. (2008). The continuing evolution of research on sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men. Sex. Transm. Infect. 84: 407-409 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Genitourinary jobs

Genitourinary jobs