rss
Sex Transm Infect 76:307-310 doi:10.1136/sti.76.4.307

Screening for HIV infection in genitourinary medicine clinics: a lost opportunity?

Table 4

Number of patients tested for HIV infection—survey of first 5000 patients seen in 1998 at 53 GUM clinics

HIV test requested HIV test offered but not requested Number (%) tested†
Exposure category Total surveyed (100%) Subtotal (100%) Number (%) tested Subtotal (100%) Number (%) tested Number (%) tested †
†Includes 40 patients known to have been tested for HIV where information on requesting and/or offering tests was unknown.
*Other includes contacts of those with STIs, sexual assault, needlestick, and other exposures to blood, IVF screening, those not sexually active, non-acute STIs.
High risk
Sexually active homosexual/bisexual man 250 161 156 (97) 51 19 (37) 180 (72)
Sexually active heterosexual from the UK, with a “high risk” contact 249 164 154 (94) 61 15 (25) 170 (68)
Heterosexual who has lived in sub-Saharan Africa 37 15 14 (93) 10 3 (30) 17 (46)
Injecting drug users who have shared equipment 37 30 25 (83) 7 3 (43) 28 (76)
Injecting drug users who deny sharing 17 11 10 (91) 3 2 (67) 12 (71)
Subtotal high risk 590 381 359 (94) 132 42 (32) 401 (69)
Low risk
Sexually active heterosexual from the UK, who denies “high risk” contact 2697 633 582 (92) 501 124 (25) 719 (27)
Heterosexual from the UK with acute STI* 1357 109 91 (83) 376 77 (20) 187 (14)
Heterosexual who has lived abroad (other than sub-Saharan Africa) 96 51 49 (96) 20 8 (40) 58 (60)
Subtotal low risk 4150 793 722 (91) 897 209 (23) 964 (23)
Other* 146 53 51 (96) 11 4 (36) 56 (38)
Unspecified 60 9 9 (100) 35 1 (3) 10 (17)
Total 4946 1236 1141 (92) 1075 256 (24) 1437 (29)

This Article

Latest from STI blog

Latest from STI blog

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of STI.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.