rss
Sex Transm Infect 2000;76:381-382 doi:10.1136/sti.76.5.381

An evaluation of near patient tests for detecting herpes simplex virus type-2 antibody

  1. Melanie Saville1,
  2. David Brown1,*,
  3. Christine Burgess2,
  4. Keith Perry2,
  5. Simon Barton3,*,
  6. Frances Cowan4,*,
  7. Giorgio Palu5,
  8. Carlo Mengoli5
  1. 1Enteric and Respiratory Virus Laboratory, CPHL, London, UK
  2. 2MDA Evaluation Group CPHL
  3. 3HIV/Genitourinary Medicine Services, St Stephen's Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
  4. 4Department of STDs, University College London, Mortimer Market
  5. 5Instituo di Microbiologia, Universita di Padova, Padova, Italy
  1. Dr Brown, PHLS, Enteric and Respiratory Virus Laboratory, PHLS, Colindale Avenue, London, UKdbrown{at}cphl.demon.co.uk
  • Accepted 10 August 2000

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the “in use” test characteristics of the POCkit “near patient” HSV-2 rapid test for the detection of HSV-2 IgG antibodies for use in the clinic. This test relies on a visual interpretation of the result.

Methods: 2093 serum samples, 229 from UK and 919 from Italian genitourinary medicine clinic patients and 945 from obstetric and gynaecology clinic patients in Italy were tested. Tests were carried out according to manufacturers' protocol in the United Kingdom and Italy. Three readers independently recorded a score for each test carried out and the results were compared.

Results: In the UK study, the three readers disagreed on the result on 5.2% of tests. In the Italian study, there was disagreement in 10.2% of tests.

Conclusions: This study has demonstrated a problem in the subjective nature of the interpretation of the POCkit HSV-2 test. It highlights the need for adequate training of clinic staff and the need for clinics to adopt policies of quality assurance and ongoing monitoring which will ensure the validity and accuracy of this clinic based test.

Footnotes

  • ↵* On behalf of the MSSVD Special Interest Group on Genital Herpes.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.