rss
Sex Transm Infect 2002;78:392 doi:10.1136/sti.78.6.392-a
  • Brief Encounters

Brief Encounters

BIG BROTHER SHOULD BE WATCHING

With the steeply rising STI prevalence seen today in many countries should we not be directing resources to finding out which sexual behaviours are bad for our health? That is, who is indulging in such unhealthy behaviour, how are these changing over time, and what key behaviours we are failing to collect and why? See p 398

WHO PAYS FOR FORESIGHT?

Screening for chlamydia, rather than testing symptomatic women, is cost saving even when prevalence falls to 1.1% if the appropriate age and tests are chosen. However, such interpretations depends on unvalidated assumptions. And of course costs saved by a later generation are incurred by earlier ones. Also, offering chlamydia testing to women undergoing termination of pregnancy has, unsurprisingly, a high pickup rate. Asking the women to pay a …

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.