Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Impact of measurement error in the study of sexually transmitted infections
  1. L Myer1,
  2. C Morroni2,
  3. B G Link3
  1. 1School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  2. 2Women’s Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  3. 3Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 L Myer
 School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, South Africa; lmyercormack.uct.ac.za

Abstract

Measurement is a fundamental part of all scientific research, and the introduction of errors of different sorts is an inevitable part of the measurement process in epidemiological and clinical research. Despite the ubiquity of measurement error in research, the substantial impacts which measurement error can have on data and subsequent study inferences are frequently overlooked. This review introduces the basic concepts of measurement error that are most relevant to the study of sexually transmitted infections, and demonstrates the impacts of several of the most common forms of measurement error on study results. A self assessment test and MCQs follow this paper.

  • measurement error

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

Linked Articles

  • Brief Encounters
    Rob Miller Helen Ward
  • Research methods
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd