rss
Sex Transm Infect 2005;81:501-507 doi:10.1136/sti.2004.014266
  • Behaviour

Audio computer assisted interviewing to measure HIV risk behaviours in a clinic population

  1. S M Rogers1,
  2. G Willis2,
  3. A Al-Tayyib1,
  4. M A Villarroel1,
  5. C F Turner1,3,
  6. L Ganapathi4,
  7. J Zenilman5,
  8. R Jadack6
  1. 1Program in Health and Behavior Measurement, RTI International, Washington DC, USA
  2. 2Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD, USA
  3. 3City University of New York, Queens College and the Graduate Center, Flushing, NY, USA
  4. 4Research Computing Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
  5. 5Infectious Diseases Division, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore MD, USA
  6. 6College of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, WI, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Susan M Rogers
 RTI International, 1615 M Street, NW, Suite 740, Washington, DC 20036, USA; smr{at}rti.org
  • Accepted 22 February 2005

Abstract

Objectives: To examine whether audio computer assisted survey interviewing (ACASI) influenced responses to sensitive HIV risk behaviour questions, relative to interviewer administration of those questions (IAQ), among patients attending a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic and whether the impact of interview mode on reporting of risk behaviours was homogeneous across subgroups of patients (defined by age, sex, and previous STI clinic experience).

Methods: 1350 clinic patients were assigned to complete a detailed behavioural survey on sexual risk practices, previous STIs and symptoms, condom use, and drug and alcohol use using either ACASI or IAQ.

Results: Respondents assigned to ACASI were more likely to report recent risk behaviours such as sex without a condom in the past 24 hours (adjusted OR = 1.9), anal sex (adjusted OR = 2.0), and one or more new partners in the past 6 months (adjusted OR = 1.5) compared to those interviewed by IAQ. The impact of ACASI varied by sex but, contrary to expectations, not by whether the patient had previously visited an STI clinic. Mode of survey administration made little difference within this population in reports of STI knowledge, previous STIs, STI symptoms, or illicit drug use.

Conclusion: ACASI provides a useful tool for improving the quality of behavioural data in clinical environments.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.