Objective: To examine the practices of anal intercourse and dry sex within a cohort of female sex workers (FSWs) in Kenya, focusing on the prevalence and perceived risk of the practices, demographic and behavioural correlates, and association with sexually transmitted infections (STI).
Methods: A survey was conducted among FSWs in Meru, Kenya, with 147 participants randomly sampled from an existing cohort of self identified FSWs.
Results: 40.8% of participants reported ever practising anal intercourse and 36.1% reported ever practising dry sex. Although the majority of women surveyed believed anal intercourse and dry sex to be high risk practices for HIV infection compared with vaginal sex, about one third of women reported never or rarely using condoms during anal intercourse, and about 20% never or rarely using condoms during dry sex. Reported consistent condom use was lower with both of these practices than with penile-vaginal intercourse. Anal intercourse was associated with experience of recent forced sexual intercourse, while dry sex was not. Anal intercourse was almost always initiated by clients, whereas dry sex was likely to be initiated by the women themselves. Sex workers reported charging higher fees for both practices than for vaginal intercourse. Both practices were associated with reported symptoms and diagnoses of STI.
Conclusions: Both anal intercourse and dry sex were common in this sample, and although perceived as high risk practices, were not adequately protected with condom use. Education and other interventions regarding these high risk sexual behaviours need to be translated into safer practices, particularly consistent condom use, even in the face of financial vulnerability.
- FSWs, female sex workers
- STI, sexually transmitted infections
- anal intercourse
- dry sex
- high risk practices
- female sex workers
- sexually transmitted infections
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Published Online First 21 June 2006
Sponsor details: The study was supported by grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Canadian International Development Agency and Rx&D Health Research Foundation, University of Manitoba. Dr Moses is the recipient of an Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Competing interests: none.
Ethical approval: Ethical approval granted by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board (Canada) and the Kenyatta National Hospital Ethical Review Committee (Kenya).
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.