rss
Sex Transm Infect 2009;85:236 doi:10.1136/sti.2009.038331
  • Editorial

Publication: a dialogue between authors and editors

  1. Rob Miller,
  2. Helen Ward
  1. Sexually Transmitted Infections, BMJ Journals, BMA House, London, UK
  1. Professor R F Miller, Sexually Transmitted Infections, BMJ Journals, BMA House, Tavistock House, London WC1H 9JR, UK; rmiller{at}gum.ucl.ac.uk
  • Accepted 19 June 2009

Soon after we took over as editors of Sexually Transmitted Infections in 2003 we were alerted by a reader to a potential overlap of content between material published in Sexually Transmitted Infections and in The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. We investigated this and took our concerns to The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). We subsequently published a Notice of Redundant Publication,1 together with a response from the authors concerned.2 The unfolding of events is eloquently described in the accompanying article written by the COPE Ombudsman (see page 236).

We urge you to read his detailed account, which has been agreed by all of those involved. It describes some of the difficulties authors and editors may encounter during the publication process—even when all parties are acting in good faith.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

REFERENCES

Relevant Article

Latest from STI blog

Latest from STI blog

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of STI.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for STI. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.