Article Text

PDF

S14 Research in progress: updates from American STD association developmental award recipients
S14.3 Evaluating the internet as an STD risk environment for teens: findings from the communication, health, and teens (CH@T) study
  1. E R Buhi1,
  2. N Klinkenberger1,
  3. H Blunt1,
  4. E M Daley1,
  5. J Baldwin1,
  6. C Rietmeijer2
  1. 1University of South Florida, College of Public Health, Tampa, Florida, USA
  2. 2Colorado School of Public Health, Denver, Colorado, USA

Abstract

Background The CH{at}T study aims to identify/characterise a group of teens reporting meeting sex partners online and a group reporting meeting sex partners in-person (not online) and examine the differences between the 2 groups in sexual health risks.

Methods Youth aged 13–19 years (N=273) visiting a publicly-funded clinic completed a 20-min Audio-Computer Assisted Self-Interview. Included were global sexual behaviour questions (eg, oral/vaginal/anal sex experience, number of sex partners) and specific partnership history questions, including meeting partners online/offline. Participants were also tested for chlamydia/gonorrhea. Audio-Computer Assisted Self-Interview responses were anonymously linked to teens' biological STD results. A χ2 test was performed to determine the association between meeting a sex partner online and current STD status.

Results Participants identified as female (89.4%) and heterosexual (80.7%). Nearly 9 in 10 (88.6%) reported oral, 97.8% vaginal, and 28.6% anal sex experience. Of those with biological STD data (n=267), 14.2% had a current STD infection. Of all teens, 15.4% (n=42) reported having sex with a partner originally met online (of these, > half [57.1%] met >1 partner). Compared with teens reporting only partners met in-person, teens reporting an online partner had significantly greater numbers of oral, vaginal, and anal sex partners. However, analyses indicated no association between having a current STD and reporting an online partner, χ2 (1, N=267)=0.95, p=0.34.

Conclusions Theory-driven STD prevention and sexual health promotion interventions should be tailored to meet specific needs of young people seeking partners both online and offline. Sex-seeking, dating, and social networking websites may represent important intervention contexts.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.