Article Text

PDF

Epidemiology poster session 6: Preventive intervention: Screening
P1-S6.12 The contribution of a Chlamydia screening programme to testing and case-finding in addition to regular STI-care in three regions of The Netherlands
  1. I V F van den Broek1,
  2. H M Götz2,
  3. E E H G Brouwers3,
  4. H S A Fennema4,
  5. C J P A Hoebe3,
  6. R H Koekenbier4,
  7. L L Pars5,
  8. S M van Raveseijn2,
  9. E L M Op de Coul6,
  10. J E A M van Bergen5
  1. 1Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
  2. 2Division of Infectious Disease Control, Rotterdam Rijnmond Public Health Service, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  3. 3Department of Infectious Diseases, South Limburg Public Health Service, Geleen, Netherlands
  4. 4Cluster of Infectious Diseases, Department of Research, Online Research and Prevention Unit, Amsterdam Health Service, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  5. 5STI AIDS Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  6. 6Epidemiology & Surveillance Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands

Abstract

Background The impact of a Chlamydia screening programme can be measured by the incremental amount of Chlamydia tests performed and cases detected as compared to the throughput in regular care. In the Netherlands, regular STI care is provided by specialised STI-centres (aimed at high-risk groups) and General Practitioners (GP's, basic opportunistic screening and care for symptomatic cases). An annual register-based Chlamydia screening programme is implemented in three regions since 2008.

Methods The number of persons tested and cases detected in the Chlamydia Screening among 16–29 year olds in Amsterdam, Rotterdam and South Limburg, 2008–2010, were compared to consultations and diagnoses in this age group reported in surveillance data from STI centres in the regions and estimates of STI care in general practices in these regions, 2007–2010. Round 3 data are based on the first 6 months of the year.

Results The baseline testing rates (at STI centers and by GP's in year pre-screening) were 10% in Rotterdam, 13% in Amsterdam and 6% in South-Limburg. CSI increased testing rates steeply in the first year to 26–30% in the cities and 17% in Limburg; this decreased to 20–21% and 13% in round 3, still doubling testing rates as compared to baseline. Positivity rates at regular STI-care facilities are higher than in CSI: 12–15% in regular care vs 4–5% in CSI; therefore the addition of CSI to case-finding in the three regions was lower than that to testing: the screening programme added about 41% on top of the cases found in regular care in round 1, but this decreased to 20% in round 3 due to lower participation and positivity rates in consecutive rounds.

Conclusions By comparison to regular testing at STI centers and in general practice, the Chlamydia Screening had a major contribution towards the number of young people tested for Chlamydia in the three regions. The addition towards case-finding was lower, because the case-detection rate of the screening programme was lower than that in regular care. The Screening programme did not seem to affect the number of patients seen in regular care, but double “consumers” cannot be excluded.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.