P3-S1.24 Cost effectiveness of self-taken vaginal swabs using GenProbe AC2 assay vs clinician taken urethral and endocervical swabs for detection of gonorrhoea

J Wilson; C Hulme; C Stewart; S Schoeman; M Wilcox

doi:10.1136/sextrans-2011-050108.424

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

Podcasts

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

PDF

Poster Sessions

Clinical sciences poster session 1: and related syndromes

P3-S1.24 Cost effectiveness of self-taken vaginal swabs using GenProbe AC2 assay vs clinician taken urethral and endocervical swabs for detection of gonorrhoea

Free

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Wilson J, Hulme C, Stewart C, et al

P3-S1.24 Cost effectiveness of self-taken vaginal swabs using GenProbe AC2 assay vs clinician taken urethral and endocervical swabs for detection of gonorrhoea

Sexually Transmitted Infections 2011;87:A275.

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Download to a citation manager

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password