Objectives Some saliva-based HIV testing programmes have resulted in an unacceptable percentage of false positives. Many countries require blood-based testing programmes to have doctors/nurses. The authors evaluate whether, after brief training and under the supervision of a skilled counsellor, blood-based self-sample collection and rapid test performance could be a valuable alternative.
Methods 208 Spanish-speaking attendees at a street-based HIV testing programme in Madrid participated in the study. Participants were tested twice, first in the study and then in the programme, using the same finger-stick whole-blood rapid test (Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo®). Based on previously adapted instructions, the study counsellor explained the procedure to follow throughout the test. Participants then performed the test under the guidance of the counsellor. Demographic and risk behaviour data were collected by a self-administered questionnaire. The test results in the programme and the study were read by the study counsellor.
Results 99.0% (95% CI 96.6% to 99.9%) of participants had a valid result in the study test, the same percentage as in the programme test conducted by the doctor/nurse. Two persons had invalid test results in both the study and the programme, but they were not the same persons.
Conclusion The study provides clear evidence that this methodology is a valuable alternative to saliva for HIV testing programmes when medical or nursing staff required to take blood samples is not available.
- HIV testing
- rapid test
- testing services
- public health
- epidemiology (general)
- programme evaluation
- outreach services
Statistics from Altmetric.com
↵* Madrid Rapid HIV testing Group: Jorge Álvarez, Óscar Ayala, María J Bravo, Jorge Gutiérrez, Mónica Ruiz, José Pulido, Sara Santos, Sonia Fernández-Balbuena.
Funding This study was funded by Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS:PI09/9074) and Fundación para la Investigación y Prevención del Sida en España (FIPSE/36634/07).
Competing interests None.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval The Ethics approval was provided by the institutional review board of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (approval number: CEI PI 16_2009).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.