Article Text

PDF

Session title: Risk Assessment, Screening Tools and Infections in MSMsSession date: Thursday 28 June 2012; 11.30 am–1.00 pm
O17 Sexual behaviour in younger MSM and self-perceived sexual risk using a local HIV Risk Assessment Tool (HIVRAT)
  1. J Alagaratnam,
  2. A Black,
  3. A Smith
  1. St Mary's Hospital

Abstract

Background HIV infection continues to disproportionately affect MSM in the UK. The 2011 HPA report “Sexually Transmitted Infections in MSM in the UK” highlights the need for one-to-one behavioural interventions. Thus, identifying those at highest risk is essential.

Aims To profile the sexual behaviour of younger MSM attending a dedicated clinic. To establish how MSM perceive their sexual risk and explore the use of a simple HIV Risk Assessment Tool (HIVRAT).

Methods MSM attending a weekly clinic offering HIV testing self-complete a 6 question HIVRAT in addition to standard history. The HIVRAT records number of male partners in previous 12 months, and number of unprotected anal intercourse (UPAI) partners (previous 3 and 12 months). It also contains a Likert scale of perceived sexual risk. Data was collected over 6 months from June 2011. Statistical analysis was performed in Excel and correlated using Spearman's Rank methodology.

Results 138 men completed the HIVRAT (aged 18–35). Median number of sexual partners in preceding 12 months = 8 (range 1–250, 42% reported >10 partners). Median number of UPAI partners in preceding 3 months =0 (range 0–5) and 12 months =1 (range 0–8). Perceived risk was scored as 1= Very low (20.4%), 2 (44.5%), 3 (28.5%), 4 (4.4%) and 5= Very high (2.2%). There was poor correlation between sexual behaviour and perceived risk. For MSM who had UPAI with one or more partners in the previous 3 and 12 months, there was a moderately positive correlation between actual risk and perceived risk (SRCC 0.517 and 0.544 respectively).

Conclusions Only 6.6% of MSM judged their personal HIV risk as high in a cohort where 36% reported UPAI with two or more partners in 12 months. Tools like HIVRAT provide valuable information which is not routinely collected. Asking about UPAI during the 12-month period prior to testing showed the strongest correlation between actual and perceived risk, and could help identify MSM who would benefit most from behavioural intervention.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.