Article Text

PDF

P3.226 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is Estimated to Be a Cost-Effective Addition to Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) For HIV Prevention in a Generalised Epidemic Setting
  1. R Ying1,
  2. C Celum1,
  3. J Baeten1,
  4. P Murnane1,
  5. T Hong1,
  6. M Krows1,
  7. H van Rooyen2,
  8. H Humphries2,
  9. J P Hughes1,
  10. R Barnabas1,3
  1. 1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
  2. 2Human Sciences Research Council, Sweetwaters, South Africa
  3. 3Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States

Abstract

Background In KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, young women face an extraordinarily high risk for HIV acquisition, with annual incidence estimates of 6%. ART-based strategies for HIV prevention have the potential to significantly decrease HIV incidence, but the impact of PrEP in addition to ART scale-up is undefined. Modeling studies suggest that PrEP targeted to highest-risk groups could maximise benefits and contain costs.

Methods We developed a deterministic transmission model of HIV that stratifies the population by age, sexual activity, and includes HIV infection stage. The model was parameterized using data from community-based HIV counselling and testing studies in KwaZulu-Natal and validated using independent HIV prevalence and incidence estimates.

We estimated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a ‘test and treat’ scenario, targeted PrEP by age and sexual activity, and general PrEP provision. Each scenario was in addition to anticipated baseline ART scale-up for CD4≤ 350 from 35% in 2013, as observed in KwaZulu-Natal, to 60% in 2018 (following national guidelines). We assumed PrEP efficacy of 70%.

Results ‘Test and treat’ (ART for 80% of all HIV-positive persons) reduced HIV incidence by 58% and averted 25% of cumulative infections by 2025, at an additional $39,900 per infection averted compared to baseline ART scale-up. PrEP targeted to 60% of 20–29-year-olds, in addition to baseline ART scale-up, reduced incidence by 42% and averted 22% of infections at an additional $22,500 per infection averted, whereas PrEP targeted to 80% of high-risk individuals reduced incidence by 33% and averted 13% of infections at an additional $7,400 per infection averted. PrEP coverage of 20% of the general population reduced incidence by 37% and incident infections by 18%, at an additional $26,900 per infection averted.

Conclusion In a generalised HIV epidemic setting PrEP is a cost-effective addition to ART, with targeted PrEP being more cost-effective than generalised PrEP distribution.

  • antiretroviral therapy
  • mathematical model
  • pre-exposure prophylaxis

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.