Article Text

PDF

P3.258 Investigating the Epidemiology of Repeat Chlamydia Trachomatis Detection After Treatment Using Chlamydia Trachomatis Omp A Genotyping
  1. R Kapil,
  2. M L Hwang,
  3. C G Press,
  4. E W Hook,
  5. W M Geisler
  1. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States

Abstract

Background Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection within months of initial diagnosis and treatment is a common occurrence. Origins of such infection (persistence vs. reinfection from an untreated or a new partner) are complex. CT strains can be differentiated by complete nucleotide sequence analysis of the ompA gene, encoding an antigenically diverse surface protein outer membrane protein A (OmpA). We are evaluating urogenital CT OmpA genotypes in an ongoing prospective CT natural history study in order to investigate the epidemiology of repeat CT detection after treatment.

Methods CT-infected subjects are prospectively enrolled, treated with azithromycin, and return for a 6-month follow-up visit for repeat CT testing using the Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo 2 (Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, CA). Urogenital specimens are collected at enrollment and follow-up, from which CT strains are genotyped by ompA amplification and sequencing.

Results Enrollment visit genotypes have been determined for 145 subjects to date (91% female, 93% African American). CT infection was detected at follow-up in 39 (27%). Enrollment genotype distribution did not significantly differ in those without versus with repeat CT detection at follow-up (major genotypes: D/Da 25%,23%; E 22%,28%; F 13%,15%; I/Ia 17%,15%; J/Ja 12%,13%). Of 35 subjects with CT strains genotyped from both enrollment and follow-up visits, 7 (20%) had the same CT strain at both visits versus 28 (80%) with a different strain at follow-up. Sexual activity post-treatment was reported in 32 subjects with strains genotyped at both visits; a new sexual partner was reported more often in subjects with discordant vs. concordant strains (52% vs. 14%, p = 0.1).

Conclusion Baseline CT Omp A genotype did not predict repeat CT detection. Most repeat CT infection detections were new infections with a different CT strain. Genotyping will be a useful tool in understanding the origins of repeat CT infection detection after treatment.

  • chlamydia
  • epidemiology
  • genotype

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.