Article Text

PDF

P4.008 Relating Multilevel Psychosocial Constructs with Risky Sex Among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) and Male-To-Female Transgender Women (TW) in Peru
  1. K A Konda1,
  2. A Silva-Santisteban2,
  3. A Maiorana3,
  4. L Pollack3,
  5. X Salazar2,
  6. C F Caceres2,
  7. S M Kegeles3
  1. 1UCLA, Lima, Peru
  2. 2Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
  3. 3UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States

Abstract

Background Risk for HIV/STIs is high among gay men (GM) and male-to-female transgender women (TW) and understanding the underlying reasons for risk is essential for planning effective interventions. Few instruments have been developed to examine psychosocial constructs for Spanish-speaking Latin American GM/TW.

Methods We developed scales to measure psychosocial constructs and then conducted a survey to assess their association with risky sex among Peruvian GM/TW (Cronbach alphas ranged from 0.66 to 0.85). We explored constructs at the: (1) individual-level (e.g. experiences of homophobia, belief in one’s capability to have safer sex), (2) social-level (e.g. social norms about safer sex, social support) and (3) community level (valuing being a part of the gay/trans community). We used student’s t-tests to explore the association between these constructs and risky unprotected anal intercourse (UAI), defined as UAI in the past 2 months with non-primary partners or primary partners who are serodiscordant or serostatus unknown, non-monogamous, or who have been a primary partner for less than 6 months.

Results We surveyed 247 MSM/TW with a mean age of 31.3 (standard deviation 8.2), 200 were GM and 47 were TW. Risky UAI was reported by 18.6% of GM/TW. GM/TW reporting risky UAI also reported significantly lower social support, feeling less capable of having safer sex, having sex in challenging contexts more often, and more experiences of homophobia/transphobia. Each of these constructs were significantly associated with reporting risky UAI with a male partner (all p-values < 0.05). Other scales were not associated with risky UAI.

Conclusions The psychosocial scales performed well among GM/TW and several were significantly associated with risky UAI. Constructs at the individual and social level were associated with risky UAI, suggesting that multilevel HIV/STI prevention interventions with this population may be more valuable than individual-level interventions.

  • HIV Prevention
  • MSM
  • Peru

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.