Statistics from Altmetric.com
Here is a quick quiz:
Question 1: In which published articles is/are the name of the organism or condition spelled correctly?
Answer: At the end of this piece.
Question 2: Do you like it when someone misspells your name?
Answer: We don't like it and you probably don't either.
There are several reasons for expecting authors to spell scientific terms correctly. First, the conventions for scientific names are meant to allow scientists to communicate precisely and accurately with each other. Incorrect spelling or terminology of the names of microorganisms can cause confusion and perpetuate mistakes. Second, an incorrectly spelled name in the title3 ,4 of an article means that scientists searching for your article might not find it. Third, and maybe unfairly, poor spelling gives editors and reviewers the impression that you do not know or do not care about the subject of your research.
A quick look at the mistakes made when spelling Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis suggests that people are confused about when to use the Latin name for the pathogen or its common descriptive name and about differences between UK and US English spelling. It didn't take long to put together the errors listed above, so we conclude that there is a real problem. Now is a good time to remind ourselves of the conventions for using and writing scientific names and to let authors know of our new guidance for nomenclature and abbreviations for bacteria, protozoa and viruses and the infections they cause.
What is binomial nomenclature?
All living organisms have two names (binomial) to describe them: a genus (generic name for a group of closely related organisms) and a species (specific name that distinguishes individual types within the group). Knapp et al6 nicely summarised the origins of the system, which were invented by Carl Linnæus, a Swedish botanist in the 18th century. Linnæus suggested two-word ‘nomina trivialia’ to make it easier to remember the names of organisms, which were originally descriptive phrases (‘nomina specifica’) that changed as knowledge accrued. The rules for nomenclature have changed over time and differences between zoology, botany and microbiology have emerged.6
Bacteria have names in Latin. All bacteria are named in five taxonomic categories: class, order, family, genus and species. The genus and species form the binomial that we use to identify the organism (table 1). The name of the genus can come from the person who discovered it, for example, Neisseria, from Albert Neisser, or a characteristic of the organism, for example, Chlamydia, which is Greek for a cloak and describes its intracellular nature. The genus might have more than one distinct species. For example, many species of Neisseria colonise humans and animals, but only two are human pathogens (N. gonorrhoeae and N. meningitidis).7 Sometimes, the species can be divided into subspecies. For example, we use the binomial Treponema pallidum to refer to the sexually transmitted infection syphilis, but there are three subspecies: T. pallidum subspecies pallidum causes syphilis; T. pallidum subsp. pertenue causes yaws; and T. pallidum subsp. endemicum causes bejel.8 Chlamydia is a bacterium with a contentious taxonomic history, having been called Miyaganawella, Bedsonia and Rakeia in the past,9 and having initially been thought to be a virus10 or a protozoan.11
Virologists have adopted different criteria for nomenclature, partly because viruses are not living organisms.12 Viruses often have names in English, for example hepatitis B virus, but they can also have Latin names, for example herpes simplex virus (herpes comes from the Greek herpein, to creep). The generic names of viruses such as HIV are not written in italics; italics are only used for the virus species name or its family. They are not capitalised unless the name is a proper noun, for example Ebola virus.
Whose responsibility is it to get the name right?
Authors probably expect copy editors to correct their spelling and editors expect authors to proofread carefully. As our published examples show, failures at both stages result in errors in the printed version. But getting to print is the end of a long process and editors and reviewers will read a manuscript before it is accepted. Authors are responsible for checking their spelling and terminology before submitting a manuscript. First impressions are important so it makes sense to get the spelling and formatting right before submission.
Advice for authors
Editors and production staff at Sexually Transmitted Infections have come up with some guidance for authors (tables 1, 2 and 3). This combines published conventions for scientific nomenclature, summarised by the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases,13 and the opinions of the editors. We try to cover spelling and abbreviations of both organisms and conditions for the most common sexually transmitted infections (table 2).
We have posted the guidance in our Instructions for Authors on the submission website (http://sti.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml) and we hope you find it useful. Please follow our guidance for all your future submissions.
Answer: all are incorrect (see table 2 for the correct spelling).
We would like to thank Yen Chau of the BMJ Production Team for helping to refine the guidance and for implementing it.
Contributors NL had the idea for the editorial and drafted it; KS drafted the tables for the production team; DL gave expert microbiological advice and JC commented on the draft. All authors approved the final version and endorse the guidance.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.