Article Text


O005 Self-taken extra-genital samples compared with clinician-taken extra-genital samples for the diagnosis of gonorrhoea and chlamydia in women and MSM
  1. Janet Wilson1,
  2. Harriet Wallace1,
  3. Michelle Loftus-Keeling1,
  4. Helen Ward2,
  5. Claire Hulme3,
  6. Mark Wilcox4
  1. 1Leeds Sexual Health, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
  2. 2Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College, London, UK
  3. 3Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  4. 4Department of Clinical Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK


Background Extra-genital tests for gonorrhoea and chlamydia are important in MSM and are increasingly important in women as vulvovaginal swabs (VVS) alone can miss infections. Self-sampling is frequently used but there has been no robust RCT against clinician-taken samples in MSM or women to assess its efficacy.

Aim To compare self-taken extra-genital samples in women and MSM with clinician-taken samples for diagnostic accuracy.

Methods Women and MSM attending a sexual health clinic were invited into a ‘swab yourself’ trial. Clinician and self-samples were taken from the pharynx and rectum (plus VVS in women and FCU in MSM) for gonorrhoea (NG) and chlamydia (CT) using NAATs. The sampling order was randomised. Patient infected status was defined as at least two positive confirmed samples.

Results 1251 women and MSM were recruited to January 2016. Overall prevalence: NG 5.7% (rectal 4.3%, pharyngeal 3.1%), CT 17.8% (rectal 16.5%, pharyngeal 4.0%). 9.4% of female NG cases and 13.8% of CT cases were VVS negative. 72% of MSM NG cases and 89.5% of CT cases were FCU negative.

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV are shown in the table:

Abstract O005 Table 1

Sensitivity & specificity of extra genital samples

Conclusion This on-going work is the first randomised study showing that self-taken extra-genital samples have high sensitivity and specificity and are comparable to clinician-taken samples. High levels of extra-genital infections were found. In women 9% of NG and 14% of CT infections would be missed using VVS alone demonstrating the benefit of extragenital sampling.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.