Article Text


P118 “LARCing about” with integrated services: Our genitourinary medicine (GUM) service users’ views on the provision of short & long acting reversible contraception (LARC)
  1. Rachel McIntosh,
  2. Kerry Burnett,
  3. Elisha Peter,
  4. Sam Walsh,
  5. Kimberley Forbes,
  6. Donna Nicholas,
  7. Divya Gupta,
  8. Gillian Avery,
  9. Charlotte E Cohen,
  10. Nneka Nwokolo,
  11. Sara Day
  1. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK


Background Integrated models are promoted as the ideal way for women to receive sexual health and contraception. Commissioners advocate shifting contraceptive provision away from GUM to general practice and community settings. Given our boroughs have the lowest GP LARC prescribing rates in England, we are concerned about compromised access to contraception and a consequent rise in unplanned pregnancy/abortion rates.

Aim To explore our service users’ preferences and experiences of accessing contraception.

Methods Between January and February 2016, an anonymised questionnaire was offered to all patients requesting contraception from four integrated GUM clinics.

Results 329 patients (median age 20–30 years) returned their questionnaire. 52%, 19% and 28% of users attended short-acting contraception, sub-dermal implant or intrauterine device (IUD) appointments respectively. 83% respondents found our service easy/very easy to access. Median LARC waiting time was 1–2 weeks. 33/86 (38%) of non-LARC and 29/109 (27%) of LARC (34% IUD, 21% implant) users experienced problems obtaining contraception elsewhere with 88% citing their GP had no suitable appointment or didn’t offer their chosen method. 77% (126/164) of respondents prefer to have their sexual health and contraceptive needs met together, whilst 6% prefer separate settings. Patients prefer obtaining contraception from: GUM(46%); GP(19%); community clinics(16%); private establishments/online(6%); no clear preference(13%). 34% of users would consider accessing LARC privately.

Conclusion Two fifths of patients had difficulty accessing any form of contraception outside of GUM, most appreciate a one-stop shop approach and half prefer GUM to be their contraceptive provider. This survey demonstrates the need to preserve GUM as a contraceptive provider.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.