Background/introduction In July 2015, routine domestic abuse (DA) enquiry was introduced in a busy, walk-in, inner-London, genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic. Guidelines, proforma and management pathway were devised. Tiered training was/is provided (basic level for all staff, in-depth for Sexual Health Information Protection team and DA champions). A separate audit demonstrated 91% of walk-in GUM patients were asked about DA, following routine enquiry introduction.
Aim(s)/objectives To assess staff engagement with routine DA enquiry.
Methods On-line survey disseminated to GUM healthcare professionals, two weeks prior to, and 6 months post-introduction of, routine DA enquiry.
Results 27 vs 20 staff completed the surveys. The majority were female [70 vs 90%]. Respondents were doctors [48.1% vs 42.1%], nurses [44.4% vs 57.9%] and healthcare assistants [7.4% vs 0%]. 3.7% vs 20% had worked in GUM < 1 year. 87.5% vs 89.5% had received training, 85.0% vs 100% of these respectively had rated this good-excellent. 4.8% vs 66.7% of respondents reported having managed patients disclosing DA at least once/week. 14.3% pre-introduction vs 0% post-introduction respondents had never managed a patient disclosing DA. Respondents reported feeling ‘very confident’ asking about DA [16.7% vs 63.2%] and managing disclosures [8.3% vs 26.3%]. 45.8% vs 63.2% thought ‘Routine DA enquiry was a great idea…why hadn’t we introduced earlier?’ 8.3% pre-introduction respondents had some reservations vs 0% post-introduction.
Discussion/conclusion Staff engagement in routine DA enquiry was high from the outset and improved over 6 months. Levels of experience and confidence in DA enquiry and disclosure management improved dramatically over this period.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.