Article Text

PDF
P020 Comparison of the aptima mycoplasma genitalium tma assay and the fasttrack diagnostics (FTD) urethritis basic assay for detection of M. genitalium in gum specimens
  1. Penny Cliff1,
  2. Cristina Vidican1,
  3. Mohammed Hassan-Ibrahim2,
  4. Katie Ovens3,
  5. Andrea Wilson1,
  6. John White4,
  7. Siobhan O’Shea1,
  8. Suneeta Soni3
  1. 1Infection Sciences, Viapath, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2Frontier Pathology, Dept of Virology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
  3. 3Dept GUM/HIV, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
  4. 4Dept GUM/HIV, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Introduction Testing for M. genitalium in the UK is limited and detection has relied on realtime PCR assays. The Hologic Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium TMA assay for use on the Panther® system is now available. This study compared a commercial realtime PCR and the Aptima assay using stored clinical specimens.

Methods Clinical specimens (76 urines, 33 vaginal swabs, 2 rectal swabs, 1 pooled sample and 2 unknowns) from men with urethritis and women with pelvic inflammatory disease were tested for M. genitalium DNA using the FastTrack Diagnostics (FTD) Urethritis Basic assay. Residual specimen was then transferred to an Aptima urine tube and tested for the presence of M. genitalium ribosomal RNA using the Aptima TMA assay.

Results Of the 113 specimens tested, 24 (21%) were positive and 87 (77%) negative on both assays. There were two discrepant results (1.7%) in urine specimens that were positive on the Aptima TMA assay and negative on the FTD Urethritis assay. One was confirmed as positive by the Reference Laboratory using their in-house MgPa PCR, indicating a false negative result on the FTD Urethritis assay. The other discrepant result was low level positive on the Aptima TMA assay and negative at the Reference Laboratory.

Discussion 98% of samples gave concordant results, indicating that both assays are appropriate for use in clinical service. However, the additional positive detected by the Aptima assay, explained by detection of target in multiple copies in each bacterial cell, suggests that this assay is more sensitive.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.