Introduction Vacuum devices are a safe and inexpensive treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) particularly when other treatments are not tolerated or contraindicated.
Methods Chart review of patients attending specialist vacuum clinic over 2 year period was conducted. Data collected included outcomes with previous treatments and vacuum device.
Results 55 patients (median age of 65 years) were prescribed a vacuum device. The median time from initial assessment at ED clinic to prescription of the device was 18 months. The majority had significant underlying co-morbidities: 25/55 diabetes, 23/55 CVD, 3/55 prostate surgery, 2/55 stroke, 1/55 spinal injury and 1/55 MS. All patients received prior ED treatment with PDE5i inhibitor and/or intracavernosal alprostadil. With regards to PDE5i, 43/55 reported poor/no response, 1/55 failed to tolerate, and in 11 patients a PDE5i was contraindicated. All 55 patients were subsequently offered intracavernosal alprostadil injections however 17 declined. Of the 38 patients who accepted, 27 reported poor/no response, 7 discontinued due to pain and 4 enquired about alternative treatments. On initial assessment at specialist vacuum clinic 32 patients consented to physical demonstration and all achieved an erection suitable for penetration. 36/55 were discharged after their initial vacuum assessment with no re-referrals. Of the19 reviewed only 1 patient discontinued use of the device and 6 patients continued on additional ED treatments.
Discussion Vacuum devices are a well-tolerated treatment option in those who fail or are deemed unsuitable for other treatments. To date, reported outcomes have been excellent with only 1 patient discontinuing use.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.