Article Text

PDF
P3.216 Assessing hpv genotype prevalence in infection and disease in young australian women following the introduction of a national vaccination program
  1. Suzanne Garland1,
  2. AM Cornall2,
  3. JML Brotherton3,
  4. SL Osborne4,
  5. CD Wrede5,
  6. JD Wark6,
  7. M Saville3,
  8. J Pyman7,
  9. J Tan8,
  10. ET Callegari9,
  11. DM Gertig3,
  12. Y Jayasinghe10,
  13. M Malloy11,
  14. M Pitts12,
  15. SN Tabrizi1
  1. 1Royal Women’s Hospital, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Parkville, Australia
  2. 2Royal Women’s Hospital, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and Murdoch, Parkville, Australia
  3. 3National HPV Vaccination Program Register, VCS, East Melbourne, Australia
  4. 4Royal Women’s Hospital, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Parkville, and Murdoch, Parkville, Australia
  5. 5Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Australia
  6. 6The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  7. 7Department of Anatomical Pathology, The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Australia
  8. 8Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne and Oncology and Dysplasia Unit, R, Parkville, Australia
  9. 9The University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
  10. 10Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Department of Gynaecology, Roya, Parkville, Australia
  11. 11National Hpv Vaccination Program Register, VCS, Parkville, Australia
  12. 12Australian Research Centre in Sexual Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Introduction The National HPV Vaccination Program, utilising the quadrivalent HPV vaccine, was implemented in Australia in 2007. As the first country to introduce this scheme, Australia is ideally placed to identify changes in HPV genoprevalence in a vaccinated population, as well as in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) lesions.

Methods The VACCINE (Vaccine Against Cervical Cancer Impact and Effectiveness) study was designed to assess prevalence of vaccine-targeted HPV genotype infections. In sub-study A, sexually active Victorian women aged 18–25 years, recruited through targeted social media advertising on Facebook, were asked to complete an online questionnaire and provide a self-collected vaginal swab for HPV DNA genotyping. The National HPV Vaccination Program Register (NHVPR) was utilised to verify self-reported vaccination status. In sub-study B, causal HPV genotypes in 529 CIN3 cases among vaccine-eligible young women were determined using laser capture microdissection and compared with pre-vaccine era data.

Results In sub-study A, 1095 participants were recruited (18% were virginal so no swab was collected) and 774 (77%) completed all study requirements. Vaccine-targeted HPV genotypes were detected in only 13 samples (1.7%); 11 HPV16 and two HPV6: none were in participants vaccinated prior to sexual debut. In sub-study B, 333 women (62.9%) had a HPV16/18 positive CIN3 detected. The pre-vaccine era population included 98 women aged 18–25, and 115 women aged 26–32, recruited between 2001 and 2005. Compared to the pre-vaccine cohort, the proportion of HPV16/18 positive CIN3 was significantly lower in the post-vaccine 18–25 year old group (71.4% vs 54.9%, p=0.009), but was not significantly different in the 26–32 year old age group (61.7% vs 65.9%, p=0.409).

Conclusion The VACCINE study demonstrates that vaccine-related HPV genotype prevalence is remarkably low amongst vaccine-eligible Victorian women, and also demonstrates a reduction in the proportion of CIN3 caused by vaccine preventable HPV types in younger, vaccine-eligible women.

Support: I Professor Suzanne Garland, have received Grants to my institution from Commonwealth Department of Health for HPV genoprevalance surveillance post vaccination, Merck and GSK (GlaxoSmithKline) to perform phase 3 clinical vaccine trials: Merck to evaluate HPV in RRP post vaccination programme, CSL for HPV in cervical cancer study, and VCA (Victoria Cancer Agency) for a study on effectiveness of public health HPV vaccine study plus a study on associations of early onset cancers. I have received speaking fees from MSD and SPMSD for work performed in my personal time. Merck paid for travel and accommodation to present at HPV Advisory board meetings.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.