Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Randomized controlled trial on whether advance knowledge of prostate-specific antigen testing improves participant reporting of unprotected sex
  1. Sarah C Thomsen (sthomsen{at}fhi.org)
  1. Family Health International, Sweden
    1. Maria F Gallo (mgallo{at}cdc.gov)
    1. CDC, Division of Reproductive Health, United States
      1. Wilkister Ombidi (wilkister.ombidi{at}icrhk.org)
      1. International Centre for Reproductive Health, Kenya
        1. Zablon Omungo (zomungo{at}fhi.or.ke)
        1. Family Health International, Kenya
          1. Barbara Janowitz (janowitzb{at}fhi.org)
          1. Family Health International, United States
            1. Mark Hawken (mh2363{at}columbia.edu)
            1. International Centre for Reproductive Health, Kenya
              1. Heidi Tucker (htucker{at}fhi.org)
              1. Family Health International, United States
                1. Emelita Wong (aybuhay{at}aol.com)
                1. Family Health International, United States
                  1. Marcia Hobbs (marcia_hobbs{at}med.unc.edu)
                  1. UNC, United States

                    Abstract

                    Objectives: To determine whether the process of informing research participants that they would be tested for the presence of a biological marker of semen exposure would reduce bias in their reports of unprotected sex.

                    Methods: We conducted a randomized trial of 210 female sex workers from Mombasa, Kenya where half of the group had advance knowledge (via informed consent) that they would be tested for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in their vaginal fluid before they reported on sex and condom use for the past 48 hours. The other half were invited to participate (via additional informed consent) in the test for PSA after they had already consented to and reported on these sexual behaviors. A trained nurse instructed participants to self-swab to collect vaginal fluid specimens, which were tested for PSA using enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

                    Results: Reporting of unprotected sex did not differ between those with advance knowledge of the test for PSA and those without this knowledge (14.3% vs. 11.4%, respectively; P = 0.27). Surprisingly, more women with advance knowledge (15.8%) had discrepant self- reports and PSA results than women without advance knowledge (9.1%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.8-4.5).

                    Conclusions: Knowing that one's answers to a questionnaire could be verified with a biological marker of semen exposure did not make respondents more likely to report unprotected sex.

                    • bias
                    • condoms
                    • prostate-specific antigen
                    • self-report
                    • sex worker

                    Statistics from Altmetric.com

                    Request permissions

                    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.