rss
Sex Transm Infect doi:10.1136/sti.2006.023531

Understanding differences between contrasting HIV epidemics in East and West Africa: results from a simulation model of the Four Cities Study

  1. Kate K. Orroth (kate.orroth{at}gmail.com)
  1. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
    1. Esther E Freeman
    1. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
      1. Roel Bakker
      1. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands
        1. Anne Buvé (abuve{at}itg.be)
        1. Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
          1. Judith R. Glynn
          1. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
            1. Marie-Claude Boily (mc.boily{at}ic.ac.uk)
            1. Imperial College, United Kingdom
              1. Richard G White
              1. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
                1. J. Dik F. Habbema
                1. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands
                  1. Richard J Hayes (richard.hayes{at}lshtm.ac.uk)
                  1. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
                    • Published Online First 3 April 2007

                    Abstract

                    Study Objective: To determine if the observed differences in risk behaviours, proportion of males circumcised and STI prevalences observed in two African cities with low HIV prevalence (Cotonou, Benin and Yaounde, Cameroon) and two cities with high prevalence (Kisumu, Kenya and Ndola, Zambia) could explain the contrasting HIV epidemics in the four cities.

                    Methods: An individual-based stochastic model, STDSIM, was fitted to the demographic, behavioural and epidemiological characteristics of the four urban study populations based on the data from the Four Cities Study and other relevant sources. Model parameters pertaining to STI and HIV natural history and transmission were held constant across the four populations. The probabilities of HIV, syphilis and chancroid acquisition were assumed to be doubled among uncircumcised males. A priori plausible ranges for model inputs and outputs were defined and sexual behaviour characteristics, including those pertaining to commercial sex workers (CSW) and their clients, that were allowed to vary across the sites were identified based on comparisons of the empirical data from the four sites. The proportions of males circumcised in the model, 100% in Cotonou and Yaoundé, 25% in Kisumu and 10% in Ndola, were similar to those observed. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess how changes in critical parameters may affect the model fit.

                    Results: Population characteristics observed from the study that were replicated in the model included younger ages at sexual debut and marriage in East Africa compared to West Africa and higher numbers of casual partners in the past 12 months in Yaoundé compared to the other three sites. The patterns in STI prevalences in females in the general population and CSWs were fitted well. HIV prevalence by age and sex and time-trends in prevalence in the model were consistent with study data with the highest simulated prevalences in Kisumu and Ndola, intermediate in Yaoundé and lowest in Cotonou. The sensitivity analysis suggested that the effect of circumcision on the development of the HIV epidemics may have been mediated indirectly by its effect on ulcerative STI.

                    Conclusions: The contrasting HIV epidemics in West and East Africa could be replicated in our model by assuming that male circumcision reduced susceptibility to HIV, syphilis and chancroid. Varying rates of male circumcision may have played a major role in explaining the strikingly different HIV epidemics observed in different parts of sub-Saharan Africa.

                    Register for free content

                    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

                    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.