rss
Sex Transm Infect doi:10.1136/sti.2008.033050

Penile Dimensions and Men's Perceptions of Condom Fit and Feel

  1. Michael Reece (mireece{at}indiana.edu)
  1. Indiana University, United States
    1. Debby Herbenick (debby{at}indiana.edu)
    1. Indiana University, United States
      1. Brian Dodge (bmdodge{at}indiana.edu)
      1. Indiana University, United States
        • Published Online First 11 December 2008

        Abstract

        Objectives: Sexual health professionals continue to promote correct and consistent condom use among sexually active individuals, yet research indicates that some men remain resistant to using condoms given perceptions that they do not fit properly or feel comfortable. This study empirically assessed relations between men’s penile dimensions and their perceptions of condom fit and feel.

        Methods: Data were analyzed from 1,661 adult men from 50 U.S. states related to demographics, a bivariate calculation of erect penile length and circumference, and perceptions of condom fit and feel.

        Results: While most men reported that condoms generally fit fine and feel comfortable, at clearly identifiable intersections of length and circumference, relations between penile dimensions and perceptions of condom fit and feel existed, particularly for those men who felt that condoms were “too long” (p < .004), “too short” (p < .000), “too loose” (p < .047), or “too tight” (p <.000).

        Conclusions: These analyses provide empirical insights into the relations between bivariate penile dimensions (the intersection of length and circumference) and men's perceptions of the positive and negative aspects of condom fit and feel. Those men with the most negative perceptions of condom fit and feel may benefit from an assessment of their condom-related concerns as a component of community- and clinic-based STI prevention interventions in order to help them select from the variety of condoms in the marketplace that may be better fitting or more comfortable.

        This Article

        1. Abstract
        2. PDF
        3. All versions of this article:
          1. sti.2008.033050v1
          2. 85/2/127most recent

        Responses

        1. Submit a response
        2. No responses published

        Register for free content

        The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

        Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.