Article Text

Pregnancy and contraceptive use among women participating in an HIV prevention trial in Tanzania
  1. Aderonke Odutola1,
  2. Kathy Baisley1,
  3. Richard J Hayes1,
  4. Mary Rusizoka2,
  5. Clare Tanton1,
  6. Helen A Weiss1,
  7. John Changalucha3,
  8. David A Ross1,
  9. Deborah Watson-Jones1,2,4
  1. 1London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  2. 2The African Medical and Research Foundation, Mwanza, Tanzania
  3. 3The National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania, Mwanza, Tanzania
  4. 4Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit, National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania, Mwanza, Tanzania
  1. Correspondence to Dr Deborah Watson-Jones, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Keppel St., London WC1E 7HT, UK; deborah.watson-jones{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives Information on pregnancy rates and factors associated with pregnancy and contraceptive use is important for clinical trials in women in sub-Saharan Africa where withdrawal of investigational products may be required in the event of pregnancy with a consequent effect on sample size and trial power.

Methods A prospective cohort analysis of pregnancy and contraceptive use was conducted in Tanzanian women enrolled in a randomised placebo-controlled trial of herpes simplex virus-suppressive therapy with acyclovir to measure the effect on HIV incidence in HIV-negative women and on genital and plasma HIV viral load in HIV-positive women. The cohort was followed every 3 months for 12–30 months. Women at each visit were categorised into users or non-users of contraception. Pregnancy rates and factors associated with pregnancy incidence and contraceptive use were measured.

Results Overall 254 of 1305 enrolled women became pregnant at least once during follow-up (pregnancy rate: 12.0/100 person-years). Younger age, being unmarried, higher baseline parity and changes in contraceptive method during follow-up were independently associated with pregnancy. Having paid sex and being HIV positive were associated with lower risk of pregnancy. Uptake of contraception was associated with young age, being unmarried, occupation, parity and the number and type of sexual partners.

Conclusions Data on use of contraceptive methods and risk factors for pregnancy can help to guide decisions on trial eligibility and the need for additional counselling. Mandatory reliable contraceptive use in study participants may be required to reduce pregnancy rates in studies where pregnancy is contraindicated.

  • HIV prevention trial
  • pregnancy rate
  • contraception
  • Tanzania
  • pregnancy
  • clinical trials
  • epidemiology
  • STD
  • AIDS
  • HSV-2
  • HSV-1
  • herpes simplex
  • Africa
  • adherence
  • herpes
  • HPV

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Footnotes

  • Funding The Wellcome Trust, the United Kingdom Medical Research Council and the United Kingdom Department for International Development.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by Medical Research Coordinating Committee of Tanzania and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine ethics committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.