You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 90, Issue 4
  • Uptake of prevention of mother-to-child-transmission using Option B+ in northern rural Malawi: a retrospective cohort study

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Programme science
Uptake of prevention of mother-to-child-transmission using Option B+ in northern rural Malawi: a retrospective cohort study
  1. Alison J Price1,
  2. Michael Kayange2,
  3. Basia Zaba1,
  4. Frank M Chimbwandira2,
  5. Andreas Jahn2,
  6. Zengani Chirwa2,
  7. Aisha NZ Dasgupta1,
  8. Cynthia Katundu3,
  9. Jacqueline L Saul1,
  10. Judith R Glynn1,
  11. Olivier Koole1,
  12. Amelia C Crampin1
  1. 1London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  2. 2Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
  3. 3Karonga Prevention Study, Chilumba, Malawi
  1. Correspondence to Dr Alison J Price, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; alison.price{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Abstract

To identify points of dropout on the pathway from offering HIV testing to maintenance on antiretroviral therapy (ART), following the introduction of the Option B+ policy for pregnant women in Malawi (lifelong ART for HIV-positive mothers and 6 weeks nevirapine for the infants), a retrospective cohort study within a demographic surveillance system in northern Malawi. Women living in the demographic surveillance system who initiated antenatal care (ANC) between July 2011 (date of policy change) and January 2013, were eligible for inclusion. Women who consented were interviewed at home about their health facility attendance and care since pregnancy, including antenatal clinic (ANC) visits, delivery and postpartum care. Women's reports, patient-held health records and clinic health records were manually linked to ascertain service use. Among 395 women, 86% had tested for HIV before the pregnancy, 90% tested or re-tested at the ANC visit, and <1% had never tested. Among 53 mothers known to be HIV-positive before attending ANC, 15 (28%) were already on ART prior to pregnancy. Ten women tested HIV-positive for the first time during pregnancy. Of the 47 HIV-positive mothers not already on ART, 26/47 (55%) started treatment during pregnancy. All but five women who started ART were still on treatment at the time of study interview. HIV testing was almost universal and most women who initiated ART were retained in care. However, nearly half of eligible pregnant women not on ART at the start of ANC had not taken up the invitation to initiate (lifelong) ART by the time of delivery, leaving their infants potentially HIV-exposed.

  • ANTENATAL HIV
  • PREVENTION
  • CHILDREN

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051336

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Introduction

    Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) is highly effective for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV, yet globally an estimated 390 000 children were infected during pregnancy, delivery or breastfeeding in 2011, 90% of whom were in sub-Saharan Africa.1 In July 2011, the Malawi Ministry of Health implemented ‘Option B+’ nationally, a policy to initiate ART for life, regardless of CD4 count, for all HIV-positive pregnant or breastfeeding women, with decentralised provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling, and single tablet regimen, triple therapy ART (in the form of tenofovir-lamivudine-efavirenz), delivered at antenatal clinics (ANC). The baby should receive 6 weeks of nevirapine, PCR-based HIV screening at 6 weeks, additional rapid testing at 12 months and 24 months and ART if HIV-positive. Option B+ replaced a modified ‘Option A’ regimen of daily zidovudine during pregnancy and combination lamivudine-nevirapine at delivery for the mother (or in case of home delivery, single dose nevirapine to take home) and 1–4 weeks of daily zidovudine syrup for the infant, depending on the mother's treatment schedule.

    This public health approach to PMTCT aims to provide a simplified and standardised regimen2 in a country with limited access to CD4 counts,3 high fertility (total fertility rate=5.7), and short birth intervals (median=3 years) and where breastfeeding is currently the only feasible option to prevent infant malnutrition.4 However, in an overburdened health system relying predominantly on patient-held records (health passport, ART identity card) and clinic registers, and where women are known to change facilities for ANC services and delivery, sharing information between facilities and services to ensure that women and infants who need PMTCT are identified, initiated and retained in care, is a challenge.

    We evaluated PMTCT service delivery and uptake in a rural population in the first 18 months (July 2011–January 2013) following policy change, by collecting information retrospectively from women who had given birth and cross-referencing with clinic registers, to established potential points in the system of care where HIV-infected women may fail to be identified or are lost to care services, resulting in more rapid deterioration of the mother's health and potential mother-to-child HIV transmission.

    Methods

    The Karonga Prevention Study demographic surveillance system (DSS) in northern Malawi covers an area of 135 km2 and a population of 35 000, with linkage to local clinical services.5 Four annual HIV serosurveys (2007–2011), with 70% participation and 98% requesting their results, show HIV prevalence is 9% in adult women.6 Trained local key informants (n=280) provide notification of all births (including stillbirths) in the DSS on a monthly basis, and the date and location of each birth and the parent's details are recorded at a home visit from a study interviewer. Each key informant covers a ‘cluster’ of about 25 households. Any births missed by an informant are captured during the re-census. Five health facilities provide antenatal services with integrated ART care and four provide routine deliveries (obstetric complications during labour, delivery and the postnatal period are referred to the district hospital, 70 km north of the DSS). Pregnant women are recommended to attend at least four ANC visits, starting before week 17 of pregnancy, and to deliver in a health facility, using a skilled attendant.4

    A retrospective cohort study was conducted among women resident in the DSS who gave birth (either a live or stillbirth) after the PMTCT policy changed (1 July 2011). All HIV-positive and HIV-unknown women were included. A random sample of HIV-negative women were also included to ascertain whether they were offered HIV counselling and testing (HCT), to avoid inadvertent disclosure of HIV status, and to identify any seroconverters. Mothers who had moved within the DSS area since the registration of a birth were sought at the new location. HCT-trained study interviewers, who did not know the women's HIV status, visited women at home to ask about HIV testing and PMTCT service uptake along the continuum of care (ANC, delivery and postpartum services). Written consent was sought for the interview, for HIV testing if indicated, and for subsequent review of health records at the clinic. Rapid testing was offered to all women unless they reported that they were HIV-positive. All participants were precounselled and those who consented to rapid HIV testing were given post-test counselling. All HIV-positive women not already on ART who were still breastfeeding were interviewed about their reasons for not starting treatment (if previously tested positive) and informed about ART services in the district and given a referral letter.

    All women who were HIV-positive (by report or rapid test), or HIV-unknown (no test or last negative test on database prior to 2011), were interviewed about breastfeeding and use of HIV care services. HIV-positive and HIV-unknown mothers who did not have a PCR test recorded in the child's health passport were offered PCR HIV testing of their infant(s), with precounselling. Mothers of babies potentially at risk of mother to child transmission (MTCT) (unknown HIV status, or HIV-positive and no ART) were advised to seek care at a government facility.

    The patient-held record and self-report of health centre attendance and service use was checked against clinic registers. If records were not identified at the facility reported, they were sought at all other clinics in the DSS. Identification used the name, age, facility and date of attendance and where available, HCT, ART and delivery identification numbers (recorded in the patient and clinic records by health staff). Authorisation to search the registers was obtained from the district health office and conducted at the convenience of each facility. Ethics approval was obtained from the Malawi National Health Sciences Research Committee and the ethics committee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

    Data were analysed using Stata V.12 software (Stata Corp, College Station, Texas, USA). Data from the HIV serosurveys, self-report, patient-held and clinic records were combined to assess services received, and points of dropout in PMTCT care.

    Results

    Among women resident in the DSS who gave birth after 1 July 2011 and before 31 January 2013, 568 were selected to participate. Of these, 35 (6.2%) had left the DSS, 45 (7.9%) could not be found and one (0.2%) had died. Of the 487 women found, 483 (99.2%) consented to interview and review of clinic records. Eighty-eight women had first attended ANC before the policy change so were excluded, leaving 395 women who initiated ANC or did not attend ANC during their pregnancy but delivered after policy change: 53 with a prior HIV-positive test result and 112 with a recent HIV-negative test result on the study database and 230 whose HIV status could not be ascertained from study records (either never tested during the serosurvey or last negative test prior to 2011).

    Characteristics of these 395 women are shown in table 1. The mean age was 25 years and 61% had not completed primary education. Patient-held records were available for 80% (316/395); ANC register entries were found for 88% of those who reported at least one ANC attendance in the DSS (338/386; two never attended and seven attended outside the DSS); and delivery register entries were found for 80% of those who reported a hospital birth in the DSS (261/326; 37 delivered at a facility outside the DSS and 32 delivered at home or with a traditional birth attendant). Most women commenced ANC during the second trimester (61%) and attended at least two ANC visits (94%), with some facility switching (9%). Only 47 women (12%) were accompanied to ANC by their husband, and four by other relatives. Almost all women (92%) reported that they delivered at a government health facility (inside or outside the DSS) and 85% used a maternity facility at the same location as their ANC (310/363; data not shown). A third (36%) of women lived >5 km from the nearest health facility.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Characteristics of 395 women in prevention of mother-to-child-transmission (PMTCT) study by HIV and ART status*

    In total, 86% reported or were documented to have ever tested for HIV before their most recent pregnancy, 90% tested or retested at ANC or HCT clinic (on the day of an ANC visit), and <1% never tested (data not shown). Of newly diagnosed HIV-positive mothers 80% had previously tested and of women who did not retest during ANC, 9% reported that testing and counselling was not offered by government health staff.

    ART uptake is summarised in figure 1. Of 53 mothers identified via serosurvey or self-report as HIV-positive prior to ANC, 16 (30%) were already on ART before pregnancy. Ten additional women tested HIV-positive for the first time during pregnancy. Among HIV-positive mothers not already on ART, 26/47 (55%) started treatment during pregnancy; almost half (21/47: 45%; table 1) reported they had been referred to a separate ART clinic and eight of these referrals occurred 6 months or more after policy implementation. Eight women known to be HIV-positive from prior study testing concealed their HIV-positive status during ANC by refusing to test and by reporting a negative status during the study interview. However one of these women was found to have started ART during pregnancy. Of 21 HIV-positive women who did not start ART, 14 revealed their HIV-positive status during interview and were asked about ART referral: three reported being offered ART in ANC, nine reported referral to an ART clinic (of whom only two attended and one was assessed but refused treatment; data not shown), and two claimed they had not received advice regarding ART. All of these women reported that ART was not offered at delivery, although four were referred, but they all refused treatment. For 15 of these 21 women there was no record of their HIV-positive status in the ANC register. Reasons reported for not starting ART included fear of disclosure (to husband (8) to others (2)), no trust in ART (10), fear of side effects (6), transport costs (1), preference for herbal treatment (4), inadequate referral from health staff (4) and the belief that ART was not yet needed, due to good health (15). Women could report more than one reason.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    HIV testing and ART uptake and usage among women in antenatal clinic. Boxes with a thick black border highlight the numbers not following the recommended testing and treatment. 1Two women received nevirapine at delivery (from residual clinic stock). 2 Mean duration of antiretroviral treatment post-delivery was 4.3 months. ANC, Antenatal clinic; ART, antiretroviral therapy; PMTCT, prevention of mother-to-child-transmission.

    Of 63 HIV-positive women, 42/63 (67%) received ART while pregnant and during delivery and among the remaining 21, two received nevirapine during labour and one started ART 6 weeks after delivery. All but one of the at-risk babies were breastfed; at least 20% of these babies did not receive nevirapine syrup and at least 80% of mothers did not return for a PCR test within 6 weeks of delivery (table 1).

    Overall, 88% of women (38/43) who had started ART, including all of those already on ART prior to pregnancy, were identified from self-report and clinic records as on treatment at the time of interview (mean 4.3 months (SD 2.3) postdelivery). Of those women who started ART during ANC, 81% (21/26) were retained in care at 6 months.

    Discussion

    While these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small numbers, in the first 18 months of policy change HIV testing was almost universal and all women who had initiated ART prior to pregnancy, and most who had started during ANC, were retained in care. At first ANC attendance 30% of HIV-positive pregnant women were already on ART and this proportion is likely to increase as Option B+ is rolled out. All the children of those women received appropriate treatment at delivery. However 43% of HIV-positive pregnant women not already on ART did not start ART during pregnancy or delivery, and at least 20% of HIV exposed babies did not receive nevirapine.

    The high level of HIV testing uptake in ANC is similar to that observed in a recent meta-analysis of opt-out testing strategies in sub-Saharan Africa.7 In our population failure to test was largely due to refusal rather than programmatic issues such as staff shortage or unavailability of test kits, as observed elsewhere.8 In other populations enhanced HIV testing uptake has been observed among women who attend ANC with their partners.9 The effect of male participation on PMTCT uptake in sub-Saharan Africa is not well understood and may vary.10 ,11 In our study, HIV testing uptake was high, and the number who attended with a husband was too small to assess any differences.

    The majority of women, including those who did not start ART, attended ANC on three or more occasions, consistent with national surveillance data,4 thereby providing several opportunities for ART initiation. However, failure to record positive HIV results in the ANC register—as observed for 71% of those who did not start ART—may contribute to missed opportunities for counselling and initiation of PMTCT at subsequent ANC visits.

    While Option B+ aims to deliver ART within ANC services, 45% of eligible women reported that they were referred to separate ART services. Almost half of these referrals occurred more than 6 months after policy change, which suggests challenges associated with provision of the integrated service in the initial stages of the policy. Higher levels of attrition have been observed elsewhere when ART services are provided in separate locations or on different days from ANC, particularly among those living far from the clinic.12–15 Higher early attrition has also been observed when women initiate ART to prevent MTCT compared with those who initiate for their own health and among those who initiate at the time of a HIV-positive diagnosis,16 which suggests greater need for education (maternal health benefits) and support services to address issues of stigma and disclosure.

    In our rural setting nearly 80% of women who initiated ART during the ANC period were retained on treatment 6 months after starting. Lower retention (70%) has been observed in urban and larger health facilities in Malawi.16 Retention on ART depends on good referral systems and linkage between facilities. While dropout was low within the time frame of this study, potential barriers to continuation in care may include transportation costs, distance to clinic and human resource constraints resulting in excessive waiting times and scheduling difficulties.17 ,18

    Strengths of the study include regular reporting of births by village informants19 and continuous demographic surveillance that provide comprehensive birth data for the population. The recent HIV serosurveys (2007–2011) with high levels of female participation and linkage to ART clinic data means that it was possible to identify, with minimal misclassification, almost all HIV-positive and HIV-unknown women in this population who initiated ANC since policy change, and who were known to be or potentially HIV-positive before their most recent birth. Limitations of the study include the small number of HIV-positive women and lack of data on HIV-positive women who experienced an early termination (<7 months) of a pregnancy.

    Option B+ is considered a cost-effective strategy for ensuring universal access to ART for PMTCT in Malawi20 and has led to substantial increases in women initiating ART during pregnancy.3 However, our data suggest that more support is required to facilitate integration of PMTCT services in ANC and to address the reluctance of some healthy women to test or reveal their HIV-positive status in ANC and/or to initiate ART during pregnancy. Studies are needed to explore these barriers and to evaluate the impact of different healthcare delivery strategies, including patient education and support services for women and their families, on uptake and retention. If refusal remains high, alternative interventions will also need to be offered to prevent MTCT.

    Key messages

    • Implementation of the Option B+ policy may be compromised by reluctance of some women to reveal their HIV-positive status in ANC and/or to initiate antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy.

    • More support is required to facilitate integration of prevention of mother-to-child-transmission services in ANC.

    • Barriers to uptake of Option B+ need to be explored and addressed with targeted health education and support services.

    • If refusals remain high, alternative interventions may need to be offered.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank Lupakisyo Chomo and Maureen Thindwa for the data collection. The authors also thank the women who consented to participate in the study.

    References

    1. ↵
      UNAIDS. Together we will end AIDS. 2012. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). 2012.
    2. ↵
      Malawi Ministry of Health. Clinical Management of HIV in Children and Adults. 2011.
    3. ↵
      1. Chimbwandira F,
      2. Mhango E,
      3. Makombe S,
      4. et al
      . Impact of an innovative approach to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV—Malawi, July 2011-September 2012. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013;62:148–51.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. ↵
      National Statistical Office (NSO) and ICF Macro editor. Malawi Demographic and Health Survey. 2010th edn. Zomba, Malawi, and Calverton, Maryland, USA: NSO and ICF Macro, 2011.
    5. ↵
      1. Crampin AC,
      2. Dube A,
      3. Mboma S,
      4. et al
      . Profile: the Karonga health and demographic surveillance system. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41:676–85.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Floyd S,
      2. Molesworth A,
      3. Dube A,
      4. et al
      . Underestimation of HIV prevalence in surveys when some people already know their status, and ways to reduce the bias. AIDS 2013;27:233–42.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      1. Wettstein C,
      2. Mugglin C,
      3. Egger M,
      4. et al
      . Missed opportunities to prevent mother-to-child-transmission: Systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS 2012;26:2361–73.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Doherty T,
      2. Chopra M,
      3. Nsibande D,
      4. et al
      . Improving the coverage of the PMTCT programme through a participatory quality improvement intervention in South Africa. BMC Public Health 2009;9:406.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Peltzer K,
      2. Mosala T,
      3. Dana P,
      4. et al
      . Follow-up survey of women who have undergone a prevention of mother-to-child transmission program in a resource-poor setting in South Africa. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2008;19:450–60.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      1. Brusamento S,
      2. Ghanotakis E,
      3. Tudor Car L,
      4. et al
      . Male involvement for increasing the effectiveness of prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programmes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;10:CD009468.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Auvinen J,
      2. Kylmä J,
      3. Suominen T
      . Male involvement and prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: an integrative review. Curr HIV Res 2013;11:169–77.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      1. Stinson K,
      2. Jennings K,
      3. Myer L
      . Integration of antiretroviral therapy services into antenatal care increases treatment initiation during pregnancy: a cohort study. PLoS One 2013;8:e63328.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Mandala J,
      2. Torpey K,
      3. Kasonde P,
      4. et al
      . Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Zambia: implementing efficacious ARV regimens in primary health centers. BMC Public Health 2009;9:314.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Hussain A,
      2. Moodley D,
      3. Naidoo S,
      4. et al
      . Pregnant women's access to PMTCT and ART services in South Africa and implications for universal antiretroviral treatment. PLoS One 2011;6:e27907.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Chinkonde JR,
      2. Sundby J,
      3. Martinson F
      . The prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission programme in Lilongwe, Malawi: why do so many women drop out. Reprod Health Matters 2009;17:143–51.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      1. Tenthani L,
      2. Haas AD,
      3. Tweya H,
      4. et al
      . Retention in care under universal antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women (‘Option B+’) in Malawi. AIDS 2014;28:589–98.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      1. Chi BH,
      2. Adler MR,
      3. Bolu O,
      4. et al
      . Progress, challenges, and new opportunities for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV under the US president's emergency plan for AIDS relief. J Acquired Immune Defic Syndr 2012;60(Suppl. 3):S78–87.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    18. ↵
      1. Govindasamy D,
      2. Ford N,
      3. Kranzer K
      . Risk factors, barriers and facilitators for linkage to antiretroviral therapy care: a systematic review. AIDS 2012;26:2059–67.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      1. Jahn A,
      2. Crampin AC,
      3. Glynn JR,
      4. et al
      . Evaluation of a village-informant driven demographic surveillance system in Karonga, Northern Malawi. Demogr Res 2007;16:219–48.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    20. ↵
      1. Fasawe O,
      2. Avila C,
      3. Shaffer N,
      4. et al
      . Cost-effectiveness analysis of option B+ for HIV prevention and treatment of mothers and children in Malawi. PLoS One 2013;8:e57778.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

    Footnotes

    • Correction notice Last name of the fourth author has been corrected since published Online First.

    • Handling editor Jackie A Cassell

    • Contributors BZ conceived the study. BZ, JRG, ANZD, AJP and ACC wrote the study protocol and contributed to the study design. AJP supervised the data collection. JLS programmed the data entry. AJP cleaned and analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. All listed authors read, revised and approved the final article.

    • Funding This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Award (096249/Z/11/A).

    • Competing interests None.

    • Patient consent Obtained.

    • Ethics approval Obtained from the Malawi National Health Sciences Research Committee and the ethics committee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.