Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Short report
The acceptability of different HIV testing approaches: cross-sectional study among GMSM in Australia
  1. M Yang1,
  2. G Prestage1,2,
  3. B Maycock3,
  4. G Brown2,3,
  5. J de Wit4,
  6. M McKechnie1,
  7. R Guy1,
  8. P Keen1,
  9. C K Fairley5,6,7,
  10. I B Zablotska1
  1. 1The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  2. 2The Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  4. 4Centre for Social Research in Health, The University of NSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  5. 5Melbourne School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  6. 6Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  7. 7Central Clinical School, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Iryna B Zablotska, Senior Lecturer, The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; izablotska{at}kirby.unsw.edu.au

Abstract

Background We explored the attitudes of Australian gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM) about the current standard-of-care (non-rapid tests at healthcare settings) and alternative approaches (rapid tests and testing in non-healthcare settings) to better understand the acceptability of alternative testing approaches.

Methods The Contemporary Norms in Networks and Communities of GMSM study enrolled GMSM in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth in 2011–2012 using peer referrals. We explored the self-reported preferences for testing: rapid versus non-rapid and in non-healthcare settings (community-based or home-based testing) versus in healthcare settings, and examined factors associated with preferences for these approaches. Analyses of associations used standard univariate and age-adjusted logistic regression models.

Results Among 827 sexually active non-HIV-positive participants, 89% had been tested for HIV. Most preferred by participants was home rapid testing (46%), followed by standard-of-care (23%) and rapid testing in healthcare (20%) or community settings (7%). About 73% of participants preferred rapid over non-rapid testing, and 56% preferred testing in non-healthcare settings rather than in healthcare settings. Preference for rapid testing was associated with being fully employed (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.81; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.82), managerial/professional occupation (aOR: 2.03; 95% CI 1.19 to 3.46) and engaging in unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners (aOR: 1.89; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.78). The same factors were associated with preference for testing in non-healthcare settings.

Conclusions Australian GMSM prefer alternative testing approaches, possibly due to their convenience. The availability of new testing approaches may provide more options for GMSM at risk for HIV infection, improve access to HIV testing and potentially increase HIV testing rates.

  • Gay Men
  • HIV
  • HIV Testing

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.