Table 1

Contact efficacy of Gay Men's Task Force (GMTF) intervention—comparison of contact and non-contact men (logistic regression)

Recognise GMTF symbolKnow meaning of GMTF acronymTalked to peer educator
Sexual health behaviourOdds ratio95% CIOdds ratio95% CIOdds ratio95% CI
†Among men reporting UAI.
‡Adjusted odds controlling for experience of sexually transmitted infection in the previous year.
§Adjusted odds controlling for frequency of bar attendance.
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Hepatitis B vaccination1.49***1.20–1.851.43**1.15–1.781.66***1.32–2.11
HIV antibody test1.42**1.15–1.771.35**1.08–1.681.32*1.04–1.66
Recency of HIV test (previous year)1.37*1.05–1.771.32*1.02–1.711.43*1.09–1.88
Sexually transmitted infections1.68*1.13–2.501.460.98–2.171.69*1.12–2.54
UAI with casual partners†0.970.64–1.460.820.54–1.230.760.49–1.18
Any GUM clinic use‡§2.91***2.24–3.762.83***2.19–3.652.25***1.73–2.93
Steve Retson Project only‡4.64***3.23–6.664.39***3.11–6.212.98***2.14–4.14
Other GUM clinic only‡0.890.62–1.280.890.61–1.280.820.56–1.23
Both Steve Retson and other GUM‡3.09***1.86–5.142.91***1.78–4.742.87***1.76–4.71