Table 3

Prevented fraction (PF) of HIV after the introduction of the different intervention strategies in the low prevalence scenario (Cotonou) in 1985, 1993, and 2005

Start of intervention; PF (time interval (years)) (%)
1985: PF(1) PF(10) Risk groups*1993: PF(1) PF(10) Risk groups*2005: PF(1) PF(10) Risk groups*
InterventionsLowHighOverallLowHighOverallLowHighOverall
*Low, low risk groups; high, CSW and frequent clients of CSW.
CSW, commercial sex worker; Gc, gonorrhoea.
B: SIDA1/2
    Female22473415452164110
858885426842276830
    Male1546438403323620
838887365847186138
C1: Extra 20% condom use between CSW and clients
    Female2145331444206409
848683406539256628
    Male1444417383223419
818685335545175937
E: Gc eradication
    Female517865407547175922
969696628463316834
    Male43777429716395533
949897567868226241
S2: Screening CSW every month + clients every 2 months
    Female325745245530114614
959595588258296732
    Male25555215484253923
939796527464216040
C2: Extra 50% condom use between CSW and clients
    Female418060297941127319
979997679370368741
    Male29797416746356637
959998588978248152
C4: C1+ extra 30% condom use between clients and low risk females
    Female434544374437244025
898786566653396741
    Male21444213393453722
858786465750256142
CS: C1+ screening of CSW every 2 months
    Female29594420572895213
949797588459317535
    Male22575412514344525
929796507765216844