Effect of limiting screening to single healthcare settings: proportion of positive women (16–24 years) detected
| Portsmouth* | Wirral† | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare setting | Number positives detected (% total‡) | Prevalence of attending population (%, 95% CI) | Number positives detected (% total‡) | Prevalence of attending population (%, 95% CI) |
| *Total positive women in Portsmouth = 1175. †Total positive women in Wirral = 551. ‡Note rows are not mutually exclusive therefore percentages sum to greater than 100%. §Combined data for antenatal, colposcopy, gynaecology, and infertility clinics; prevalence cannot be calculated as overall attending population unknown (groups not mutually exclusive). | ||||
| General practice | 719 (61%) | 9.1 (8.5 to 9.7) | 164 (30%) | 9.8 (8.5 to 11.3) |
| Family planning | 431 (37%) | 10.8 (9.9 to 11.8) | 127 (23%) | 11.0 (9.3 to 13.0) |
| GUM | 210 (18%) | 17.2 (15.2 to 19.4) | 123 (22%) | 20.4 (17.3 to 23.8) |
| Youth sexual health clinics | 33 (3%) | 18.6 (13.6 to 25.0) | 143 (26%) | 13.3 (11.4 to 15.5) |
| Termination of pregnancy clinics | 75 (6%) | 13.5 (10.9 to 16.6) | 15 (3%) | 12.6 (7.8 to 19.8) |
| Women’s services§ | 27 (2%) | – | 75 (14%) | – |