Table 2

Sample characteristics,^* by active utilisation of the intervention

	Round 1 (n=329)				Round 2 (n=433)
	Active (n=162; 49.2%)		Not active (n=167; 50.8%)		Active (n=264; 61.0%)		Not active (n=169; 39.0%)
	N	%	N	%	N	%	N	%
Age, y
Less than 25	19	11.7	31	18.6	34	12.8	16	9.5
25–29	35	21.6	35	21.0	52	19.7	33	19.5
30–34	30	18.3	29	17.4	56	21.2	36	21.3
35–39	49	30.3	37	22.2	62	23.5	37	21.9
40–44	16	9.9	16	9.6	29	11.0	23	13.6
45–49	10	6.2	12	7.2	19	7.2	17	10.1
50+	3	1.9	7	4.2	12	4.6	7	4.1
	p=0.594				p=0.268
Children	139	85.8	148	88.6	233	88.3	153	90.5
	p=0.445				p=0.459
Currently married	16	9.9	35	21.0	55	20.8	44	26.0
	p=0.005				p=0.210
Geographic proximity	135	83.3	142	85.0	233	88.3	140	82.8
	p=0.674				p=0.112

Literacy	56	34.6	45	27.0	99	37.5	51	30.2
	p=0.135				p=0.119
Venue
Agriculture	8	4.9	15	9.0	16	6.1	7	4.1
	p=0.151				p=0.386
Brothel	11	6.8	15	9.0	48	18.2	17	10.1
	p=0.463				p=0.021
Street	14	8.6	14	8.4	22	8.33	34	20.1
	p=0.933				p=0.000

↵* Numbers refer to those who responded ‘yes’.