Table 1

Comparison of the prevalence of syphilis*, HIV, CT and NG between round 1 and round 2 IBBAs among clients of FSWs by district and state

Syphilis prevalenceHIV prevalenceCT prevalenceNG prevalence
Round 1Round 2Round 1Round 2Round 1Round 2Round 1Round 2
State/district% (95% CI)% (95% CI)p Value% (95% CI)% (95% CI)p Value% (95% CI)% (95% CI)p Value% (95% CI)% (95% CI)p Value
Andhra Pradesh6.1 (5.1 to 7.1)1.3 (0.8 to 1.8)<0.0016.5 (5.5 to 7.6)5.2 (4.2 to 6.2)0.0741.2 (0.6 to 1.8)0.6 (0.3 to 0.9)0.0620.4 (0.1 to 0.8)0.0 (NE)NE
 East Godavari7.1 (4.6 to 9.6)2.2 (0.8 to 3.7)0.0019.1 (6.3 to 11.8)7.2 (4.7 to 9.8)0.3451.2 (0.0 to 2.3)1.0 (0.0 to 2.0)0.8170.0 (0.0 to 0.0)0.0 (NE)NE
 Guntur11.2 (8.1 to 14.3)1.0 (0.0 to 2.0)<0.0017.5 (4.9 to 10.1)5.9 (3.6 to 8.2)0.3720.9 (0.0 to 2.1)0.3 (0.0 to 0.7)0.2780.0 (0.0 to 0.0)0.0 (NE)NE
 Hyderabad5.4 (3.2 to 7.6)2.3 (0.8 to 3.7)0.0193.7 (1.9 to 5.5)5.3 (3.1 to 7.4)0.2852.0 (0.4 to 3.5)1.5 (0.3 to 2.7)0.6470.0 (0.0 to 0.0)0.0 (NE)NE
 Vishakhapatnam3.2 (1.5 to 5.0)1.0 (0.0 to 2.0)0.0268.0 (5.3 to 10.6)3.5 (1.7 to 5.2)0.0060.5 (0.0 to 1.3)0.3 (0.0 to 0.7)0.6661.8 (0.1 to 3.6)0.0 (NE)NE
 Warangal3.5 (1.7 to 5.3)0.3 (0.0 to 0.7)0.0014.5 (2.5 to 6.5)4.2 (2.3 to 6.2)0.8571.2 (0.0 to 2.4)0.0 (NE)NE0.6 (0.0 to 1.4)0.0 (NE)NE
Maharashtra5.0 (3.9 to 6.1)3.9 (2.9 to 4.8)0.1267.6 (6.3 to 8.9)6.1 (4.9 to 7.2)0.0782.7 (1.9 to 3.5)1.1 (0.6 to 1.6)0.0010.7 (0.3 to 1.1)0.6 (0.2 to 1.0)0.682
 Mumbai3.3 (1.5 to 5.1)4.9 (2.7 to 7.0)0.2778.6 (5.9 to 11.4)5.7 (3.3 to 8.0)0.1124.3 (2.3 to 6.3)2.4 (0.9 to 4.0)0.1501.0 (0.0 to 2.0)1.6 (0.3 to 2.9)0.466
 Parbhani3.2 (1.5 to 4.9)3.0 (1.4 to 4.7)0.8845.0 (2.8 to 7.1)3.3 (1.5 to 5.1)0.2392.7 (1.1 to 4.3)0.0 (NE)NE0.5 (0.0 to 1.2)0.0 (NE)NE
 Pune6.0 (3.7 to 8.3)3.2 (1.5 to 4.9)0.0616.5 (4.1 to 8.9)6.9 (4.5 to 9.4)0.8002.5 (1.0 to 4.0)1.0 (0.0 to 2.0)0.1030.3 (0.0 to 0.7)0.5 (0.0 to 1.2)0.567
 Yevatmal7.5 (4.9 to 10.1)4.5 (2.5 to 6.5)0.07310.5 (7.5 to 13.5)8.3 (5.6 to 11.0)0.2701.3 (0.2 to 2.3)1.0 (0.0 to 2.0)0.7351.0 (0.0 to 2.0)0.3 (0.0 to 0.7)0.177
Tamil Nadu3.8 (2.7 to 4.9)4.6 (3.4 to 5.8)0.3412.7 (1.8 to 3.6)5.9 (4.6 to 7.2)<0.0010.8 (0.3 to 1.3)0.4 (0.1 to 0.8)0.1880.0 (NE)0.0 (NE)NE
 Chennai4.4 (2.4 to 6.4)11.8 (8.6 to 14.9)<0.0012.2 (0.8 to 3.7)12.0 (8.9 to 15.2)<0.0011.5 (0.3 to 2.7)0.0 (NE)NE0.0 (NE)0.0 (NE)NE
 Madurai3.0 (1.3 to 4.7)1.0 (0.0 to 2.0)0.0432.2 (0.8 to 3.7)3.7 (1.9 to 5.6)0.2160.0 (NE)0.8 (0.0 to 1.6)NE0.0 (NE)0.0 (NE)NE
 Salem4.0 (2.1 to 6.0)1.0 (0.0 to 1.9)0.0053.5 (1.7 to 5.4)2.0 (0.6 to 3.3)0.1731.0 (0.0 to 2.0)0.5 (0.0 to 1.2)0.3930.0 (NE)0.0 (NE)NE
Karnataka3.9 (3.1 to 4.7)1.8 (1.2 to 2.3)<0.0014.2 (3.4 to 5.0)3.3 (2.6 to 4.1)0.1242.3 (1.7 to 2.8)NANA0.6 (0.3 to 0.9)NANA
 Bangalore Urban4.5 (2.8 to 6.1)0.8 (0.1 to 1.6)<0.0012.4 (1.2 to 3.5)1.9 (0.9 to 3.0)0.5873.1 (1.8 to 4.4)NANA0.6 (0.0 to 1.2)NANA
 Belgaum3.9 (2.0 to 5.8)2.0 (0.5 to 3.4)0.1226.6 (4.2 to 9.0)3.0 (1.3 to 4.6)0.0141.2 (0.2 to 2.3)NANA0.0 (0.0 to 0.0)NANA
 Bellary6.0 (3.7 to 8.3)2.7 (1.0 to 4.4)0.0305.4 (3.3 to 7.6)6.8 (4.3 to 9.3)0.4151.7 (0.4 to 2.9)NANA0.5 (0.0 to 1.1)NANA
 Shimoga2.1 (0.8 to 3.5)1.5 (0.2 to 2.8)0.5272.4 (0.9 to 3.8)1.9 (0.5 to 3.2)0.6300.7 (0.0 to 1.5)NANA0.5 (0.0 to 1.1)NANA
 Mysore2.9 (1.3 to 4.6)2.4 (0.9 to 3.8)0.6095.4 (3.3 to 7.6)4.0 (2.1 to 5.9)0.3314.0 (2.1 to 5.9)NANA1.4 (0.3 to 2.5)NANA
Total4.8 (4.3 to 5.3)2.6 (2.3 to 3.0)<0.0015.4 (4.8 to 5.9)4.9 (4.4 to 5.4)0.2271.9 (1.5 to 2.2)0.7 (0.5 to 1.0)<0.0010.5 (0.3 to 0.6)0.2 (0.1 to 0.3)0.058
  • p Value based on Pearson χ2 test.

  • *A subject was considered as having active syphilis when both the rapid plasma reagin and Treponema pallidum haemaglutination assay tests were positive.

  • †These p values are given for the comparisons between non-Karnataka districts, as NG and CT were not available in Karnataka in round 2. CT prevalence in non-Karnataka districts was 1.7% in round 1 (0.4% for NG).

  • CT, Chlamydia trachomatis; FSW, female sex worker; IBBA, integrated behavioural and biological assessment survey; NA, not available; NE, not estimated; NG, Neisseria gonorrhoeae.