Table 2

Diagnostic performances of UWCC, parallel UWCC/GSUS and stratified diagnosis for the prediction of Chlamydia trachomatis or Mycoplasma genitalium infection using validation samples

Diagnostic performance comparison of UWCC versus UWCC and GSUS performed in parallel using validation samples (n=228)
UWCC* sensitivityParallel UWCC* and GSUS† sensitivityp Value‡UWCC* specificityParallel UWCC* and GSUS† specificityp Value‡UWCC* PPV§Parallel UWCC and GSUS PPV§UWCC* NPV¶Parallel UWCC and GSUS NPV¶
C. trachomatis71.4%
(42 to 90.4)
78.6%
(48.8 to 94.3)
0.5N/AN/A29.4%
(15.7 to 47.6)
26.8%
(14.8 to 43.2)
97.9%
(94.4 to 99.3)
98.3%
(95 to 99.5)
M. genitalium66.6%
(35.4 to 88.7)
66.60%
(35.4 to 88.7)
0.25N/AN/A23.5%
(11.3 to 41.5)
19.5%
(93 to 35.3)
97.9%
(94.4 to 99.3)
97.9%
(94.3 to 99.3)
C. trachomatis
or M. genitalium
69.2%
(48.1 to 84.9)
73%
(51.9 to 87.6)
0.03192%
(87.2 to 95.2)
89.1%
(83.7 to 92.8)
0.0353%
(35.3 to 69.8)
46.3%
(30.9 to 60.3)
95.8%
(91.7 to 98)
96.2%
(92.1 to 98.3)
Diagnostic performance comparison of UWCC versus stratified diagnosis using validation samples of asymptomatic patients only (n=176)
UWCC* sensitivityStratified diagnosis** sensitivityp Value‡UWCC* specificityStratified diagnosis** specificityp Value‡UWCC* PPV§Stratified diagnosis PPV§UWCC* NPV¶Stratified approach NPV¶
C. trachomatis100%
(40.3% to 100%)
60%
(17% to 92.7%)
0.5N/AN/A19.2%
(7.3% to 39.9%)
30%
(8% to 64.6%)
100%
(96.8% to 100%)
98.8%
(95.3% to 99.8%)
M. genitalium50%
(17.4% to 82.6%)
12.5%
(0.6% to 53.3%)
0.25N/AN/A15.4%
(5% to 35.7%)
10%
(0.5% to 45.9%)
97.3%
(92.9% to 99.1%)
95.8%
(91.1% to 98.1%)
C. trachomatis or
M. genitalium
71.4%
(42% to 90.4%)
28.6%
(9.6% to 58%)
0.03190.1%
(84.2% to 94%)
96.3%
(91.8% to 98.5%)
<0.0138.5%
(20.9% to 59.3%)
40%
(13.7% to 72.6%)
97.3%
(92.9% to 99.1%)
93.8%
(88.9% to 96.9%)
  • *UWCC were defined as positive if the patient’s urine contained >29 White blood cell per µL.

  • †GSUS testing containing >5 PMN per high power fields (HPFs) over 5 HPFs was examined.

  • ‡p Values represent the results of statistical comparisons of either sensitivity or specificity between the two test methodologies. These were generated using McNemar’s test for paired binary data with the results of C. trachomatis NAAT testing upon BD Viper System or real-time PCR for M. genitalium as the reference standards.

  • §Positive predictive value.

  • ¶Negative predictive value.

  • **Positive stratified diagnosis is defined as patients treated for urethritis due to suggestive clinical history.

  • GSUS, Gram-stained urethral smear; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification testing; UWCC, urinary white cell counts.