Table 1

Partner characteristics and sexual risk behaviour by relationship type (BFR vs non-BFR; n=271 relationships)

Dyad characteristicsBFR
%* (n)
n=44 relationships
Non-BFR
%* (n)
n=227 relationships
p ValueOR (95% CI)AOR† (95% CI)AOR‡ (95% CI)
Partner risk characteristics
 Older by >2 years25.0 (11)30.0 (67)0.610.82 (0.39 to 1.74)0.77 (0.37 to 1.63)
 Partner concurrency28.6 (12)27.1 (57)0.401.46 (0.61 to 3.48)1.50 (0.59 to 3.83)
 Partner STD/HIV11.6 (5)7.3 (16)0.361.68 (0.55 to 5.19)1.55 (0.50 to 4.79)
 Partner injection drug use2.3 (1)0.4 (1)0.225.17 (0.38 to 71.0)5.74 (0.60 to 54.8)
 Partner sells drugs30.2 (13)22.6 (49)0.151.70 (0.82 to 3.51)1.78 (0.85 to 3.74)
 Partner gang involvement14.0 (6)7.3 (16)0.251.82 (0.66 to 5.04)1.90 (0.68 to 5.30)
 Partner arrest45.5 (20)26.8 (59)0.022.17 (1.14 to 4.15)2.01 (1.04 to 3.88)
 Partner incarcerated38.6 (17)17.4 (38)0.0042.72 (1.39 to 5.33)2.45 (1.22 to 4.94)
Type of partnership
 Main partner86.4 (38)61.2 (137)0.0013.70 (1.20 to 11.4)3.92 (1.19 to 12.9)
Sexual risk behaviour within relationship
 Index concurrency11.4 (5)29.6 (67)0.750.72 (0.09 to 5.45)
 Unprotected vaginal sex93.2 (41)50.4 (114)<0.000117.6 (4.48 to 69.5)18.40 (4.41 to 76.40)12.3 (3.92 to 38.7)
 Unprotected anal sex29.6 (13)8.4 (19)0.00034.53 (1.99 to 10.3)4.67 (2.02 to 10.80)3.32 (1.34 to 8.22)
 Contraceptive non-use38.5 (15)20.2 (42)0.012.72 (1.30 to 5.72)2.59 (1.21 to 5.53)2.06 (0.91 to 4.67)
  • *Column %.

  • †Adjusted for respondent age and race.

  • ‡Adjusted for respondent age and race, partner arrest and incarceration, and main partner.

  • AOR, adjusted OR; BFR, biological fathers of their children; STD, sexually transmitted disease. Bold value indicate statistical significance.